IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Resignation request

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Mon, 02 March 2020 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5185C3A0BE1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:44:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fr1YgvcZ4YHU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93C03A111B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:44:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803EB49; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:44:06 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1583181844; bh=kEzCGDgZ0IBnIJjoBYv s+XFGh7ZlDZwFWsdRCS0Fun0=; b=Ri1xKtw79L6lX98L//xZisnOR2QPWlLnfFe WW53ksYttq5czpqJRLUixrYVbZIs4d0HeuJaX/mmi1vldN3PnsLxj9xXqltDIEXm HK8gTVoB4DxKAVf9VaqKJj+Sq4MUY34rY/zyevp4exInbL9Zt6VGrLZ8j9Z9s52s RPBmOsOI=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id grW8Yp2G11YT; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:44:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:2022:41af:c4f2:3aef] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:2022:41af:c4f2:3aef]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00A873C; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:44:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <BEB53004-7475-4A25-8082-84979801D522@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2D7BF39B-4AD6-400B-B24E-55F6D1D72DFA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
Subject: Re: Resignation request
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 21:44:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: <79f62760-6e76-4b5d-8f3c-d014e12e4ee1@www.fastmail.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
References: <E85AEEC7-AAE7-4AE8-966E-FDF7AFD2B47C@steffann.nl> <79f62760-6e76-4b5d-8f3c-d014e12e4ee1@www.fastmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aJe8XtWG0dbYW1WFjgAq3Rog54Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 20:44:40 -0000

Hi,

> Not judging one way or another (that is not my job) - but asking for resignation via a message like would be a request that falls outside the IETF process. If there is any discontent with decisions an AD made (such as when you believe a decision was made in error), the IESG has an appeals process that should be followed.
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/appeals/

That is going on in parallel.

But this action is so disrespectful to the community that I feel more is needed.
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email