IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 01 July 2010 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EBA3A6948 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.162, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20vqA+QMcax6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E793A694E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C219D9A4740; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:35:45 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Do2TfbUpqekp; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:35:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.108] (pool-96-241-163-123.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.163.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011869A473C; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:35:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C2D0A2C.6020604@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:35:40 -0400
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
References: <CFB08C07-DE90-47BE-ADFF-FC72162BBFA1@daedelus.com> <4C2BBD51.2060605@ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20100701070804.0c26b8a0@resistor.net> <6D6E25E2-057B-4591-9288-1283036D0374@cisco.com> <20100701154421.GB43159@shinkuro.com> <92C447BB-792E-4EF7-ACAC-C91A4D27DC51@bogus.com> <20100701170744.GD43159@shinkuro.com> <4D37C04B-711B-4B1E-8299-3B0CD85D2DC4@muada.com> <4C2CEA82.8010904@vigilsec.com> <6BD98591-0FB1-49CF-AB0B-FAF71FCDE24C@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <6BD98591-0FB1-49CF-AB0B-FAF71FCDE24C@bbn.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:35:26 -0000

Richard:

> Is there a reason that the anonymous IDs are opt-in?  Why not have all
> the IDs be anonymous?

Asked and answered.  I previously said:

: One reason for using the registration ID was to allow people to
: use the network before they check-in at the IETF registration desk.
: Another reason was fewer tasks for the people manning the IETF
: registration desk.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email