IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Thu, 01 July 2010 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228353A6A49 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.737
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.737 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.862, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CTKNVzX3fY1G for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F103A6784 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.11] (static-167-138-7-89.ipcom.comunitel.net [89.7.138.167] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id o61JW4QJ048570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 21:32:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Subject: Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C2CEA82.8010904@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:32:16 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5482D813-80EE-4128-959B-B0DDD8BD22C7@muada.com>
References: <CFB08C07-DE90-47BE-ADFF-FC72162BBFA1@daedelus.com> <4C2BBD51.2060605@ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20100701070804.0c26b8a0@resistor.net> <6D6E25E2-057B-4591-9288-1283036D0374@cisco.com> <20100701154421.GB43159@shinkuro.com> <92C447BB-792E-4EF7-ACAC-C91A4D27DC51@bogus.com> <20100701170744.GD43159@shinkuro.com> <4D37C04B-711B-4B1E-8299-3B0CD85D2DC4@muada.com> <4C2CEA82.8010904@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:32:14 -0000

On 1 jul 2010, at 21:20, Russ Housley wrote:

> Again, the use of anonymous registration IDs is available to you and
> anyone that wants one.  If you are concerned about the logs, then you
> should use one.

I'm concerned about the correlation between my MAC address and the hosts I communicate with. Anonymous IDs don't help against that, but not logging does, because then the only way for a government to obtain this correlation is on an individual basis rather than casting a wide net that catches large amounts of previously logged information.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email