IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Sat, 03 July 2010 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F143A687E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 09:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7xF0nx1cVdRQ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 09:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5153A682A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 09:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so3215998vws.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=X3BlGtsDeuWwl9Yql0wy3vlyQaOw2gnjys28zi60Dsw=; b=Bndd5wRydDuTjcQrPgAl/yYQ3JO2DE8TSRt7svMvhH1XQSsf6yqVTqcnXbSWs6GQzL IUoTfaXOk0+06gS3jRnE7YwCO75q9ixEfaczScRFV05UYNJE+yhiv6Q76Hs1yxYmgluh 7xIMG8hmjom0uOggLc8+Q2MDKDpNFdSTTOwoY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=MZOUz39Lw9u2lu7CNxoBQESpxPDaY5YBOiYrVUpDRXTpJ9f3R44jXvZoqmFkK9OSzN JN8tujRyywkzb69oMM9XjgtFnd+1bVxd+5EBJMRHmeNwcPjHQCS8TDThKMiLV3nTAGSW 2H06ENglgf4W+7UIyqlcCQyM5kTMfvuUGYcwg=
Received: by 10.220.59.202 with SMTP id m10mr232205vch.59.1278173051291; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.95.202 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 09:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20100701231916.768AA3A67EC@core3.amsl.com>
References: <CFB08C07-DE90-47BE-ADFF-FC72162BBFA1@daedelus.com> <4C2BBD51.2060605@ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20100701070804.0c26b8a0@resistor.net> <6D6E25E2-057B-4591-9288-1283036D0374@cisco.com> <20100701154421.GB43159@shinkuro.com> <4C2CE406.7090600@vigilsec.com> <20100701231916.768AA3A67EC@core3.amsl.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 12:03:51 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6AuU5ZtrW5wGRNDlSrAP2EjURCKC3J_e_mJ93@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:04:03 -0000

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> wrote:
> I would expect this (per user login) to fade away after Beijing - unless and until the IAOC and IETF agrees that its necessary for the longer term.  And I don't believe that discussion has been had.

I would like to second this.

IMHO, the best IETF network experiences have been when the IETF took
over the entire hotel network for the week, including the guest room
access whether wired or wireless, and allowed free access to all hotel
guests. I hope that we can return to that model in the future.

Cheers,
Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email