IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 02 July 2010 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261DF3A68A0 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.439, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NOOsA3Ld-veA for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD343A6873 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sm-PC.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id o62MPr8I001825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1278109563; x=1278195963; bh=/IueeYKj0dAJIwAs+03D6wV9OO25glSPqcFqVfqc9G8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=iIh+QE7gI+PePY9mxcOSsER5Gxdzr8mG/Jb1tJP+HU5X3SsVinG2PLzg78Xci24MJ q1CD2AKvKcqHy9kE6Y4XLdIL9a9mu2ODRk+ph6NBHMrHQ1DL17b3fAvCSQFzbYs9Qm RfeKag/cg2S3K+SUZHIfrh1tiK2NAF7apv+JcWSk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1278109563; x=1278195963; bh=/IueeYKj0dAJIwAs+03D6wV9OO25glSPqcFqVfqc9G8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=HyuwwkOSY2OSgVcEjBC36Ljb/unlOVt31sU8mIVlQB1zWPdllvJ7mzocP2uiylN1R 2J9RRj3vnV+kGPDN1uf55QVjQ6Jh+dCNA/tGXnpld5unkOOikYavRfHyv8CR0dqCvx VrEYenWHkTQusyyvSl3nuny35Dx2Ke7ObDDvMkeg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=APibVIM6PII7NAQ1uhh7wQUg/qJcaueOOf3EkMvxIzca9HBzP+apUFFLX5bQq39xN AVk8r2YUf4nZIirHOyuPlC+ktN0gDCVWz7M6ihJG/6o/5BMriYtsYmEnK69gMePkM8d 9Blp8QxlqEnXseOw0D4Do2VKgVwldoByNH3GNqI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20100702152300.0a057218@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:25:17 -0700
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1007021132480.11299@pita.cisco.com>
References: <CFB08C07-DE90-47BE-ADFF-FC72162BBFA1@daedelus.com> <4C2BBD51.2060605@ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20100701070804.0c26b8a0@resistor.net> <6D6E25E2-057B-4591-9288-1283036D0374@cisco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100701210616.0b95a600@resistor.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1007021132480.11299@pita.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:25:53 -0000

Hi Ole,
At 11:33 AM 7/2/2010, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>Could you please summarize in one paragraph exactly what problem
>you have with this setup?

I do not have any problem with the setup.  I support what Ted Hardie 
said in the last paragraph of his message.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email