Re: ISMS working group and charter problems

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 07 September 2005 22:50 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ED8k7-0001G4-MS; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:50:11 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ED8k4-0001F9-83 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:50:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA27847 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 18:50:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.178] helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ED8nJ-0006mX-HF for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:53:30 -0400
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id CFF9AE0049; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 18:49:58 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
References: <474EEBD229DF754FB83D256004D02108BBC8F1@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:49:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <474EEBD229DF754FB83D256004D02108BBC8F1@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> (Eric Fleischman's message of "Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:20:03 -0700")
Message-ID: <tsl7jds333d.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ISMS working group and charter problems
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "Fleischman," == Fleischman, Eric <eric.fleischman@boeing.com> writes:

    Fleischman,> I believe that network management is too important a
    Fleischman,> functionality to be designed such that it can only be
    Fleischman,> usable within highly confined environmental
    Fleischman,> constraints.

"must work everywhere," is a highly constraining environment.

You certainly may revisit the UDP vs TCP decision on the IETF list;
doing so is an appropriate last recourse under our process.

However I do not believe it likely that you will get IETF consensus on
a specific UDP direction.  I also do not believe it would be
productive to take this issue back to the working group.  So, I ask
what you believe I should do if you fail to get consensus?  If your
options are no ISMS or ISMS over ssh, which would you pick?

--Sam


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf