IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ISMS working group and charter problems

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 06 September 2005 18:35 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ECiIQ-0000QY-3N; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:35:50 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ECiIN-0000O1-Qa; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:35:47 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA12200; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:35:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.mit.edu ([18.18.3.197]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECiLP-0004vR-BZ; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:38:55 -0400
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id E65BEE0049; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:35:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <431DD3BD.9090108@cisco.com> <431DD94C.8070907@dcrocker.net>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:35:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <431DD94C.8070907@dcrocker.net> (Dave Crocker's message of "Tue, 06 Sep 2005 11:00:44 -0700")
Message-ID: <tslfysi2ge8.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: ISMS working group and charter problems
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> writes:

    Dave> (By the way, I am awestruck at the potential impact of
    Dave> changing SNMP from UDP-based to TCP-based, given the
    Dave> extensive debates that took place about this when SNMP was
    Dave> originally developed.  Has THIS decision been subject to
    Dave> adequate external review, preferably including a pass by the
    Dave> IAB?)

Certainly one of the reasons I requested IETF-wide review for the ISMS
recharter is so that decisions like this can be reviewed by the
community.  The IAB gets to see charters at about the same time as the
IESG does; they have sent no negative comments to this charter.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email