Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring

[[e-mail]]

On 7 sep 2004, at 02.13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> [e-mail] wrote:
>>
>
> I'm very puzzled. I though those two extremes were exactly described
> by scenarios A and D.

Perhaps I misread, but while I saw that A and D are the extremes of the 
scenarios represented to date, I was suggesting is that the extremes 
not yet discussed are:

- full integration into ISOC with the rework of the by-law that 
accommodates the standard's function. Scenario A tends toward this but 
does, seem to me, to go all the way.

- Creation of a parallel non profit incorporated Standards organization 
with its own by-laws  that is partnered though MOU's with ISOC.  
Scenario D might evoke this, but since the explanation of this Scenario 
is so brief, I have trouble understanding its implications.

In both I have trouble understanding the full implications in terms of 
items not within the administrative domain.

If A really does equal full integration and D really does equal full 
independence, then I will stand corrected, though I will remain 
confused about some of the implications.


a.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf