Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Thu, 12 September 2019 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143E0120169 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eq-eT2SrJlqx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7BFB1201E5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id w2so2335770qkf.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W/TFguxJZbjNhLoMaGJv5OwxAEtVG/TdmYByWaC0huI=; b=eOas81yDgvNvHT0v8MkEto0mP+Bzk+fvvc0zrJ7DnU7ynC61QZ/70wT+6e7x3n7PqM lGoqFiG8jR8VjmDQB4sqxRU57F+nZXLEB03Iw697y0JhtAEZjHWQylXIU+iNAipwaieH aRHiLSXc+Bycz4RR48SUXaw+3dXICfsYB6JUXP20dvX+GkzGkQuk12CMFUdEn62qRmm6 VkKK2ZiGI4Pmf6Qu4lOzUX9XvkfZMIv6g3yLe3Cm8je3GbchnOkERUEsY0bfMV9bbvkv BrfDEWEN6Tg4wJg3S7cdeA8gWPKZ6vkRd38Ao4McO/dPy5sNVaxIXhMKNh167CtGoG/x /D5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W/TFguxJZbjNhLoMaGJv5OwxAEtVG/TdmYByWaC0huI=; b=rCvcNVjWi7Of/0DNnQQ8rrKW9qbaO7TiQVAFNdS9EKtuLsa+vJPaK/jL/T1C4NKp/h Ll4FOUlis791rJfHypgOdiWIRvYZzW17HWadAR0uLgJzS3jHEVy3uzoMiYADXl4Qjm/R 5i57OaAQ7pSC7CqZBloS7fggZfdtOE7iiha1ZL8FH9pngqpMm3p4uqjcbc2aCG0RhWYT 70p3XIjwYlYgCMGd72ejQ0WegSBL4lZHOyF1jixQsGav6j1W8BzDJOoUqHAHy6R2zkPL LYMvyZJzBRmRsLK/rr6zwNoR40y5XtyeAFlwjLaW45QhknNuHlbk6coPCXb1wR7s2Dyc 4r0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWjh0dsX6wOya3ix4tbcnP8GywYi4l46+9TgP3K+Jkj5oXqdzE1 fe+Y7Tl4u+IIN1hQm805f2uiD7HF0FWVhzfJPYQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNhEFADJDYh5HH01hYf2PeHoIg8ufK8B0/ljAFhM4jgJyispFypyKFgwwp9TR2xV9IQjwSDAWjKCas/eF8vQ4=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4f84:: with SMTP id d126mr43378710qkb.430.1568307661701; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJKvdoy9MtzHMwq-Ew-EJoUs0V8t+y01FL-E5r3xdyRemQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKvdoy9MtzHMwq-Ew-EJoUs0V8t+y01FL-E5r3xdyRemQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:00:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2Q8P7DyoTzTy=LQxStjKiuxZS-pWPATWjHm-SsvTLqpg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000013081105925e1597"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tIGr1uRYkIpIZIzUmw374t8vASQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:01:08 -0000

Barry,

Sounds good, let's give it a shot.

Cheers,
Andy


On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:14 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>;
wrote:

> As we discussed in the plenary session at IETF 105 in Montréal, some
> community members have suggested moving document last-call discussions
> onto a dedicated "last-call" mailing list, and off of the general
> <ietf@ietf.org>; list.  The latter is a high-volume list with a lot of
> varied discussion, and some think that it would be useful to separate
> the general discussion from the last-call discussion, to allow people
> to choose which discussions (or both) to follow.  In the IETF 105
> plenary, support was expressed for that separation.
>
> The IESG agrees, and wants to try an experiment to that end.  We
> propose to create <last-call@ietf.org>; and to direct last-call
> comments and discussions there (the last-call announcements would
> still go to <ietf-announce@ietf.org>;, with "reply-to" set to the new
> list).  That list would be monitored by volunteers recruited by the
> IETF Chair, and digressions would be nudged back to <ietf@ietf.org>;,
> while we would ask people having last-call discussions on this list to
> please move them to the new list.  We would get the tools team
> involved so that the distribution lists for directorate and
> review-team reviews would be updated appropriately.
>
> Our plan is to create the new list and pre-subscribe everyone who is
> subscribed to <ietf@ietf.org>; at that time.  Of course, anyone could
> unsubscribe to either or both lists immediately or later, but we think
> that doing it this way would minimize the likelihood that people would
> miss important stuff because of the move, and folks can choose what
> they prefer from there.
>
> After six months, we would do an initial evaluation, including getting
> feedback from the community, to see how the experiment is working.  If
> it seems worth continuing we would do so, and at a point that the
> community decides that the experiment is a success (should it so
> decide), we would start an update to BCP 45 to formally move the
> location for last-call discussions, and we would update the 2007 IESG
> Statement on Last Call Guidance.
>
> We invite comments, here, on this plan, by the end of September. As I
> say above, we've heard support from the community for the general
> idea, and we'd like to make sure this direction is what the community
> wants.
>
> Barry, for the IESG
>
>