RE: Proposed Update to Note Well

"Robin Uyeshiro" <uyeshiro@IfA.Hawaii.Edu> Fri, 22 June 2012 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <uyeshiro@ifa.hawaii.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2195D21F8621 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mpM-vlMRt+4M for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hale.ifa.hawaii.edu (hale.ifa.hawaii.edu [128.171.2.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8343021F85D3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XeonAL (xeonal [128.171.163.193]) by hale.ifa.hawaii.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5MKn8Wt020171; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:49:08 -1000 (HST)
From: Robin Uyeshiro <uyeshiro@IfA.Hawaii.Edu>
To: 'Jorge Contreras' <cntreras@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Proposed Update to Note Well
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:49:42 -1000
Message-ID: <1CC7E58691B04ECDB9D4CE5340072A03@XeonAL>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0043_01CD5064.BDF4C860"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6863
In-Reply-To: <CAP0PwYYfBtgGifZVi287JmAWxMm2Rr3jAUg8-BKOKMjskRo47w@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-Index: Ac1Qt6iCp3SSXciYQHGQIqJ3X5KQuAAAIVIg
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Importance: Normal
Cc: 'Bob Hinden' <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 'IETF' <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:49:11 -0000

 "Ownership" is not a term used.  "Control" can
be problematic, if the inventor changes employment.  If you invent something
for which a patent is issued and assigned to your company, then you change
employment, then neither you nor the company you currently work for
"control" that patent.  


This is just not correct.  If the patent is assigned to the company, and the
inventor leaves the company, the company still owns and controls the patent.

 [RU]  Your new (current) company does not "own" the patent and neither do
you, if you have signed away your rights, which you are required to do for
most companies in the US.  But you should still disclose the patent.