IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 17 September 2020 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6549C3A0CE8 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BTLBEzvfJ636 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADB0C3A0CE6 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2F064B0; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:57:17 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1600358237; bh=uw0g/t/DBpfdXcwGNyte5gD4wltkQBr8X7SQoWHv+74=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=P4v4Khrw2rHF8NHXcoOXX1780fg0wt2fO3unIhm1LHgCguEwouNc0d9euaOX7d7MB Cb98MxDnF7rZ1itVY9GJb5uAv+1hU4Wnx/NAriLBk1t1Q40MP4Mgd/ia/NmlvxfALX zb5h1KlACV6m2xbzvzEwOrqqa4gySHECtAS9R+M0=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1DEAF; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:57:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:57:17 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
cc: int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB0285683F5088BF58EE2FFB8FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171752270.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <BA9AA3A6-AD8E-448C-8435-9861ED6DB844@cisco.com> <VI1P194MB02854BE1477807D40AD44E34AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200917140810.GA29793@nic.fr> <VI1P194MB0285AEE49C63F9DF0E18021FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAMGpriXM-uZOSxtWB4ALoRgcYR9nS+mn8Zc6qH=TLrYJdkRZSA@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285A5F033CEF5385C2819C6AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171657170.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se> <VI1P194MB0285B828AE12BF3614C06E2CAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALx6S35_MBozY6Hx=ajLz1hPQceVcw4-=NDgFQEQQn9UTgUm_A@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285683F5088BF58EE2FFB8FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/FOgv6NWZapISQpuEX7vSYMPeqyk>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:57:21 -0000

On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Khaled Omar wrote:

> Why people don't want to participate in this work?

Because we know it won't work. It's waste of time.

You do not understand 95% of the problem space.

You need to sit down, learn DNS, Socket interfaces, packet on the wire 
(v4/v6) what routers do, and then you need to take all of that and apply 
your IPv10 proposal to it and go into all the details. If you did, you'd 
understand why it doesn't work.

You've wasted hundreds of hours of our time already, now go do the hard 
work. People here won't do it for you. It's your idea, spend the time to 
turn it into somehing more concrete.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email