IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Thu, 17 September 2020 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547803A0C98 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MO2UPo-FDxEs for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR06-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-vi1eur06olkn2043.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.17.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D9D3A0930 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=SCnBArDiIgqxUELzGFAenJ1i96lJKt66Cowf62Y7La5dSFNBVVF+6NjC8Uxn7myO4kDWxqT+om14oOPPfAsaiJRNIH1qgAMVX2Rd4QP72GzZ5oLVZpJMlmY72K+S9mmSwMqwC0mN5xPllL/Y95T6UKsMWGzgc5YoeP6M1Q6IE00ISYKdhDbZo103PVDNljbTjP+0nM9wbOIK/+z1zfac00y1+5MmSM5mN9dYKCQBBZn828LKFDpjpjO4TIjbFSeRdOozjMjQCIqzwWamzmUGBGv+SmPktX3WB+6AU7DjtDDDqAp1Us5x56Dsu0IJwSdafd0PhydWEiIiHte+x+5Ojw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=lkQSL2mZFm1Y4IfCRv0ImFzV/hb3yfHstRrlQkx/NTA=; b=Ry1FyFDdUS47bPRiuh4HeTPBcxRLM1HF2FpCfAyhfN0u59y2TEa/Sykl5Wync00j5t2DuPBqfHQ22xsysLx3aB5y87rvwPU8zOFRA5qwsJL55/MzpsxiYO9QLbAYc+NzFNEFv1ZF/XfwFlCb0u+i7Iduecq+4kmm5B2/YzsO5lfMLcU/g2SCgnfmyftELfU9D3sYEi4I6LYAybCl3rpdgFSKIkS3vkh4u0xM0d/YirGcbc0ETGaxpELBD3XWmY8AALjfZWSQH9ZVrF0QmBHZ+oIgQxCeqggyx2NHaM4femwC0+0FopEUwr0W4IJAN7sRyQLsRwoW0mZ915kG13000g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=lkQSL2mZFm1Y4IfCRv0ImFzV/hb3yfHstRrlQkx/NTA=; b=mCvd/ap2csVku4GDPT8K3AFh7h7k4xGCOyP7VWq7AArknUchb4szMkXrIplfkAlKesmcXJLQ/Tuo/QmAY443OQnfMquhcDEB0TbjaTDmMPontiAew3qGqdhwoj6XPW9LBFUONQ4ByMx/taEe/GjNnIyxl2tfimGXiyDusQ+IvlrE+agNyg4W94oX6FXdCuESsdqgsTwxKkZRUB3F8La/apqQzQPrVutUpqjj9ddaUEDljChqQMsfI/ZJYyK/0f3tFzf8vTg6o+/noAfpdzNDRkxurJwL78NYYl/EAg+khzI3K9/UJNWoJG5RF88qIOkDgyHohUsFbIM3sSgyngHYXw==
Received: from VI1EUR06FT027.eop-eur06.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc37::4d) by VI1EUR06HT226.eop-eur06.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc37::208) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:03:01 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:fc37::4e) by VI1EUR06FT027.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc37::283) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:03:01 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8]) by VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3370.019; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:03:01 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
CC: int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
Thread-Index: AQHWjP7L3OzsI1IrrUOQMcSsCBfM66ls5A7AgAAJWYCAAANzMIAABOKAgAABS6CAAAVqgIAAAIHw
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:03:01 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1P194MB028507775E1A4779B408B0FEAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <BA9AA3A6-AD8E-448C-8435-9861ED6DB844@cisco.com> <VI1P194MB02854BE1477807D40AD44E34AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200917140810.GA29793@nic.fr> <VI1P194MB0285AEE49C63F9DF0E18021FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAMGpriXM-uZOSxtWB4ALoRgcYR9nS+mn8Zc6qH=TLrYJdkRZSA@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285A5F033CEF5385C2819C6AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171657170.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se> <VI1P194MB0285B828AE12BF3614C06E2CAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALx6S35_MBozY6Hx=ajLz1hPQceVcw4-=NDgFQEQQn9UTgUm_A@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285683F5088BF58EE2FFB8FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171752270.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171752270.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:6FD3FC745146F960D98502ADD3E03A975CDE262F898E77A9AF80394EC4608FC2; UpperCasedChecksum:57336D625E25E9B0418509A7484945DFDFDFB189499C724107EE6CB475E88D86; SizeAsReceived:7673; Count:44
x-tmn: [OKy2bghM4YbIkBUYbj5xg39lZTdJv1ES]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f998407a-2f9c-4e98-059e-08d85b232760
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1EUR06HT226:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: THtVY1q/3tQFMUEG79j/CDcFzjBtsG7rzW8xrmHZ/xlaj0KOy1IUEBb2T9dQwvyS8QrHLk3UU4Oqk1DfKlMZnOCRVt2KxAm301hzDaAvRsSlov0ISdnaY+HP+CROy9Qzi/R0Y2FiEV4t69n99umGvgyGuJ7ZGa9tqd4DHu0OrmuDX0XstQjX+rwm5mATCpTp+L+Qie5gGNUYOnvN6JUI2Q==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: VXwOaSrarkZjB0kWKFX74DeB4hnSYR7L5jqGg5k6rdWz9D+yAwkuy28fChdKltWX7P35rZk3Rg5E/6G/SEx1wTbYD68wSIzf3uIL+PuHDgvjBhySIZCtXC3XTSiBaFbpyiMrSgaSSympoSI71MWr6Q==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: VI1EUR06FT027.eop-eur06.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f998407a-2f9c-4e98-059e-08d85b232760
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Sep 2020 16:03:01.4852 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1EUR06HT226
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/1hktE7NS3mTSFiZRcFFpMpsrW8c>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:03:06 -0000

This sounds to me as NEP is not making benefits at all, and then someone used it :-)

And the funny thing when people said it is fine to take something from the market and don't pay :D

Please lets close this discussion for now as it has no benefits and waste time because of the comments that keeps saying "it will not work" and "no", because I cannot guarantee for you something I didn't implement.

Hope to find somewhere else where we can discuss technically and implement and say clear and accurate answers.

Thanks,

Khaled Omar

-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 5:57 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Khaled Omar wrote:

> Why people don't want to participate in this work?

Because we know it won't work. It's waste of time.

You do not understand 95% of the problem space.

You need to sit down, learn DNS, Socket interfaces, packet on the wire
(v4/v6) what routers do, and then you need to take all of that and apply your IPv10 proposal to it and go into all the details. If you did, you'd understand why it doesn't work.

You've wasted hundreds of hours of our time already, now go do the hard work. People here won't do it for you. It's your idea, spend the time to turn it into somehing more concrete.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email