IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 17 September 2020 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B105D3A0D9D; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9zCwf5CG6glx; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74C513A0C8F; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 36CC328072D; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:37:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2F5BE280730; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:37:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275B228072D; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:37:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AC0603AD04; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:37:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0CE153FCF5; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:36:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:36:45 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200917143644.GA956@nic.fr>
References: <BA9AA3A6-AD8E-448C-8435-9861ED6DB844@cisco.com> <VI1P194MB02854BE1477807D40AD44E34AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200917140810.GA29793@nic.fr> <VI1P194MB0285AEE49C63F9DF0E18021FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAMGpriXM-uZOSxtWB4ALoRgcYR9nS+mn8Zc6qH=TLrYJdkRZSA@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285A5F033CEF5385C2819C6AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB0285A5F033CEF5385C2819C6AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.5
X-Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-10-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.001192, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.4.9.2830568, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2020.9.17.142118, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.77.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2020.9.17.5770001
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/ao4Ei6mQnIVWcgXGlb_hintH6O8>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:37:30 -0000

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:31:41PM +0000,
 Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote 
 a message of 189 lines which said:

> I’m not a code developer, really we are repeating same requirements,

I assume this is because some persons believe that you will understand
why IPv10 is wrong only when you'll try to implement it. Otherwise,
you continue to live in delusion, despite many theoretical
explanations.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email