IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Sat, 19 September 2020 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D253A09D5 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 05:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fGC_Nj3AmHV7 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 05:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092074042.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.74.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D963A09D1 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 05:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GQT4J7Por6J5UQXOZIYXRWoujvfiEgsoAwBu/w1dZpYNT8CdP4rjK3jNOukVpZrrvOkfMPI0nKb6ycMDaqxqecgdAQ3Kdqp74bbJ6kNRmRpkFbv8oXNV5sP14u5HoDwRpTa2faoNo19WNGG3Y/Brb18EXWuSfhejxYD3TeuncGCO9AAzq+rXa1fGT/5ZdIKclGvzHY8wpDg6dDcGxWhHx9IUS6SubSvaKr/qVxmXcZ97dp1+wUo+vGn110W8/1VpSnZpCrFXvZEnOYTQ+4enpSNiiCkBUn8OmkPTMHAuLgN9lYVn4Af9kvZRz9NBLKXQF47jA8zztAukfdNZJWfw9g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=QuCXdELh26i9EyGo9/ZSHxG2xv5HGuBBXFl3bec61Mg=; b=PbwpR3T7av2IcKdePtxldFWdM7iAL1ZqHUoUL+i2PVsGmPQX0LfdrME7Z9NXOuFKesoBCnEZsp+ahcMW6lfXUUDqRx+lJzLWuOMuDD//waLq/oG3Qk0G5hizK6ms9FccG2vonFclduEzETfdiJcPggG5vN7Ed/X1Wv6jKDIf1czN3cH1eJxkQZK4Z67TSmQALMawJVekwKteTrFK+De1BlzW8sIw3RdELZDPJUyo2ZpX+DHyUuoosX1jGr43PS/ZICfmlHpb2TUJKkj9xkuO7XQD55CFMttokLKfYuAkz1LVsOROLm9VoA/E8xMvlbrK+KCsNO6L7/eeBfP3FnWEyw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=QuCXdELh26i9EyGo9/ZSHxG2xv5HGuBBXFl3bec61Mg=; b=p99gewZ0I+HeRQvTHnsEiZtFmfFM6yBf0dpr19MMyaRvGxoBvPwiSA3xkQjWCj379p+5LOfUisVgE0WgcTQtdBClN0Zyd06ie+Ke4yi4Dg/UMRXlIcvL2Zaswpfh2M0Im8I5/yAkadSKOMBlVblhVzEpYNZyCUuwh68b3UuQg1QWOVPUFOHpgpxDtZRxYe5frR2cdITksMw+9qF9PJ3n57VC/F5atR6fq4X4bKBsAnmWzAOYVFOW7zi/ESkji2qouz/iXMz++rhENFC9cPQXK9UN/GFRAHAZp10Qw0T4ytkLvLT8ME4p0oxjVpae8sG0ReFXbRCq1fYwfXp/YdIhBg==
Received: from VI1EUR04FT051.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0e::4c) by VI1EUR04HT220.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0e::141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.15; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 12:46:24 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7e0e::4d) by VI1EUR04FT051.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0e::439) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.15 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 12:46:24 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8]) by VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3391.017; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 12:46:24 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
CC: Per Øyvind Heldal <heldal@eml.cc>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
Thread-Index: AQHWjP7L3OzsI1IrrUOQMcSsCBfM66ls5A7AgAAJWYCAAANzMIAC33+AgAAQ+KCAAAergIAAAVhw
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 12:46:24 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1P194MB028519E76BE0008AF6298E17AE3C0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <BA9AA3A6-AD8E-448C-8435-9861ED6DB844@cisco.com> <VI1P194MB02854BE1477807D40AD44E34AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200917140810.GA29793@nic.fr> <VI1P194MB0285AEE49C63F9DF0E18021FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAMGpriXM-uZOSxtWB4ALoRgcYR9nS+mn8Zc6qH=TLrYJdkRZSA@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285A5F033CEF5385C2819C6AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171657170.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se> <VI1P194MB0285B828AE12BF3614C06E2CAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <c267a0bd-b939-49b1-8e8b-bbed9dafddf4@eml.cc> <VI1P194MB02858A3DDA3009236017BAD7AE3C0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <D2107BB9-0B6A-4A71-922A-4719BB309978@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2107BB9-0B6A-4A71-922A-4719BB309978@fugue.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:B9CD1A07D1B30D4E3939A52FEBD93CD76E757FF58BCD337B65C59ADAFA55C32A; UpperCasedChecksum:84019678F6BE11C655A9A1C307011041E4A28DC391E5319FD0E752DABA066137; SizeAsReceived:7704; Count:44
x-tmn: [upzbyKNtjxSVdOwDgoia4tkeOntRU+53]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e8e3b721-a185-4b46-8e20-08d85c9a04b2
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1EUR04HT220:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Zi/qM2f2D/CvePg0o+k5ISjnCWLJWQc9s9pwfGBChKfLJFKCY0Hd3E+B/nsu0zCxzUFMiFbuaFzPUPT3Q2RQR0penUWLearGyth16DmhLcFNpXh9vsFHsuM3VMdH43EjpQ4JKEDisXpPbWs79pMzS9YI7+JY+YCl4zya9w8Jcxlnu99pbbRVxAOVOHBXgXJCED5/O9RJcFmOZUL8k5Z1yA==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Yxx7FNJz+ys3lm5DI5Q/ULXIkZOVA9QmIAvpO+EVwVc7o75llwpxGzaEitF9fXKRvLsyfLb/YvOzvma5pi9IBK7MPKeuGxYhC27hsWKuSkXD0OJeol5aMOkRkQzSX1u2Okoif61d+GFoc2qh/uSMeQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_VI1P194MB028519E76BE0008AF6298E17AE3C0VI1P194MB0285EURP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: VI1EUR04FT051.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e8e3b721-a185-4b46-8e20-08d85c9a04b2
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Sep 2020 12:46:24.5325 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1EUR04HT220
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/ngd0XJ00HxU37JAr1gXTGZQI06A>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 12:46:33 -0000

Because one thing I’m trying to do, to solve an important issue, we cannot keep watching the division and do nothing.

Again, one of my proposals was taken without noticing, and some people were saying same as you now, the issue is that (and I’m sorry to say this) you don’t say the truth, even there is a pressure behind your back, better for you to avoid saying the opposite of what is inside you rather than saying what you say now.

Believe me, working on IPv10 draft will bring benefit for all, for the Internet, users, network engineers, and IETFers just we some organized fashion.

Khaled Omar

From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2020 2:36 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Per Øyvind Heldal <heldal@eml.cc>; int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

On Sep 19, 2020, at 8:10 AM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com<mailto:eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>> wrote:
I can keep trying as long as walking on the right road.

Why do you think you are walking the right road?

Sometimes it’s true that a person can be a voice in the wilderness crying out a truth that others refuse to see, it’s true. But another explanation for this phenomenon is that what you are saying isn’t true, and that’s why nobody believes you. Why are you coming to the IETF with this? It’s because this is where the people are who understand the Internet. And yet we are saying “no” to your proposal, over and over again. Why do you trust us enough to come to us with your proposal, but not enough to listen to us when we tell you that it is not solving a problem that we think needs to be solved?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email