IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Thu, 17 September 2020 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0743A0F0C for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id US0IZk11wCu4 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092069044.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.69.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 345DC3A0EFF for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=goyVgfuFKQbzUcImQOyVDU/I6zEatEY9iujwllWsNTDiN05DPXENqgcPZMbT8G2zRaHYHAcOlvMtMUyPS1fQX6o6faq5Vnwzlwow+d4cum7VYUdBzetXDWIo+9ZoJQSAKwFal6q3TkczYrdBlEL82atj0wcA0WN7M5P5WaT1iaLdp8qiw7rJ5ng2Un73H8yfAwtfESyYx5QxvkINlZQ83zsR1haA1S8TuqH/pnw5hwrFP3+4TOT85vEuIlcd98VJybp3sAzVdbClAwbyaIIvTqeENz83prhrFTnp0+ABwFzKvd41zBkUhG3qyFAToekmevjIK9O7pFeja4dVWBbS3A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Q3iHvQVzYSxmh9fZbCGDFAj1mScSVGI0Cz4nXifY6XA=; b=LR6pKtNjaKx/FEKSkB/3a/+0jSoJCwEUXyMonRMpdD/9a1T7sIxnk8rhCJw+Pr9NEjaPEsOmyQcjiSBf7eo1EIHBqYJuWk4+FvkryygboJEhwTyi/ROz0O3SY+9HYnsm/1GJ8cQaFwpoyJ09Z58L4TTRLcKPk31jNhkkpZ8mlzvPMbsR9Y2gmhiUnqsrTTh1/MbU4bXw7n1XXmdryRez+3BpugoVO31jwdR1VNskB3SXpLKhYq6gnCDXtxoyTchvNRa78SHBPnTxsxZmsIK8P07nua5fm8DC4bQiQLfWMdmHwrt2TV+FFSF+aG5ehcnsGXopmxT9soGX24b/2XHamQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Q3iHvQVzYSxmh9fZbCGDFAj1mScSVGI0Cz4nXifY6XA=; b=NbvLoJZsEa02Eoz3jcRKKi9l16b3LjRd0KUh5nb38zuVM1JX60t0tiSHDRXurQqIKtUY6dHBR4t4dfZU8B4a1fN8FQ/pzme05pI24tq0RMWatDZF1N/ILpb3wdeZieDwlwKf38nfLIiX5vW4sfkWDeqFzAnIo8ZiNM+obfQ6CiZKbeUP2s18XVN1kdAQ0f0AIk65UFtfdplQh5ltH0pCWtSVx9sULzPgRYGYM+IS0/f7MqDo6bmi/OPfUX49/TjxUIwln23e8XxdQp1qtCwnvs5BSBl9dYnouIKHVG1avO+3e9qV7fCZz73CGh9nAXOodSAy2MsYrJ1lt7E9n7j4Ng==
Received: from AM5EUR02FT052.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e1c::4f) by AM5EUR02HT213.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e1c::320) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.15; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:15:58 +0000
Received: from AM0P194MB0274.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7e1c::51) by AM5EUR02FT052.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e1c::269) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:15:58 +0000
Received: from AM0P194MB0274.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::5d76:2f36:ccef:17d2]) by AM0P194MB0274.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::5d76:2f36:ccef:17d2%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3391.014; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:15:58 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
CC: int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
Thread-Index: AQHWjP7L3OzsI1IrrUOQMcSsCBfM66ls5A7AgAAJWYCAAANzMIAABOKAgAABS6CAAASYgIAAAJywgAAB2wCAAB+EwIAAAUWAgAAAOWCAAAMPgIAAAIQA
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:15:58 +0000
Message-ID: <AM0P194MB02744C5165860B83C566A7ECAE3E0@AM0P194MB0274.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <BA9AA3A6-AD8E-448C-8435-9861ED6DB844@cisco.com> <CAMGpriXM-uZOSxtWB4ALoRgcYR9nS+mn8Zc6qH=TLrYJdkRZSA@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285A5F033CEF5385C2819C6AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171657170.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se> <VI1P194MB0285B828AE12BF3614C06E2CAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALx6S35_MBozY6Hx=ajLz1hPQceVcw4-=NDgFQEQQn9UTgUm_A@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285683F5088BF58EE2FFB8FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALx6S35i3dZtYGsdBx+xYQtpD94DjPvBUidWDJe6iii8XKQZmA@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB028513083D501F28BCE9E191AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171802310.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se> <VI1P194MB02851B5BC82EB19C9980DF57AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <135074F1-ED58-4643-BE40-BDD644D6641A@consulintel.es> <VI1P194MB0285FCBC13A61B1AC1BDAE5CAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009172010370.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009172010370.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:8F251DCDCF562A3DA2A28F6E86A38A5937E60620B2BC52721F00119407935618; UpperCasedChecksum:B492CF1941DE9DAED97DFA28F37D23319F474E92EF4BB9A0CCCF667D308E809C; SizeAsReceived:7946; Count:44
x-tmn: [SIVBIgv+3IRd3RBHqBkBgwxLsn5lE+zj]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 96df483b-9681-4718-fd36-08d85b35ba38
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5EUR02HT213:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: r5aJE/Mefz5rKqbGjuCFBfwwNum4PR6AUkkuVRpSb76fBDerWDuYk1+nBbQwKFfR6Yaevmmsa+NrMISPyZKC2iO7W4BbGV1iS6IR3q2p8h8zeMbPn14tuikBPrmMSTMHLh2Hjrmsa16yBL0nD6H1E290aV0UcArun6FM1SQZSMFMnZMvswfl+1ORp5YEHbcvhacUU32J4H9C7JlvF+DDOA==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: S0PbEy+tOHmg9qu3fWSjTC9phg/ynqGDCyrXQcUPyuVajBbOaffjXhQAtp+0cbI0/JDh2k4g5n0Cl9K0iOlHBQhITO+JtS0uz1zcsw2AshYbkw2Y/NdvYf9yE2fC7C7wMU7EAu4sUrsED8pyFoml2g==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM5EUR02FT052.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 96df483b-9681-4718-fd36-08d85b35ba38
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Sep 2020 18:15:58.7687 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5EUR02HT213
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/5o461NcOrt-VleOQJN1x-T9fJac>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:16:04 -0000

I just wanna see which one is better (in simplicity and efficiency), IPv10 or 464Xlat ?

Look, you answered my question, or I hope it is not a mistake :-)

Khaled Omar

-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:12 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Khaled Omar wrote:

> So in this scenario:
>
>        A                                                                                                   B
> IPv6-ONLY -------- CLAT ---------- ISP ------------ PLAT ---------- 
> IPv4-Only
>
> How can A communicate to B ?

Read the documents. There are RFCs and lots of blogs/articles on the topic.

Also there are hundreds of millions of cell phones already using this. 
They have IPv6 only connectivity on the radio.

T-Mobile in US is one example.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email