IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Thu, 17 September 2020 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B7E3A0B76; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FOMqyvcAP7pt; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092072019.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.72.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5D483A0B82; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=M7s4cn8+U730JNM2cRoaaJROD2PuBgx6RNVNDEQsz1Gqjp6UZ7kXXEowE4FTjxAGTx2kl/ZtYnGH0G5UzeaZhSdmBKcsCXZM0zsyV572XKN2MYj4STeYEfDDHn6da2SVmTZFRMeM+OQOcyu36m//g1/CJOMmvGOEcJskKotKH2t6RgnGb6k8Y113lfsk6d2AyWyUrY27rQ/vEd7Ry34rxbXpPS+F5gBnONqJ29R1wvpy9uViXRDYEaOyK4RZtyTxlnY4NsboU3+IepurdATet+YA39P5y/MFiapXa0lFvyOTfag9rvrD1JbQIycHtVkiaOwuqZzZddmA3le+R09EyA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=IWQTK0aUZF9j7koRNjR05Wwlh49DHerYAnz2HXC7MgQ=; b=gZlB5eh34UMm0eDih0LG/G0KbJzeaIHbCG9fSOpmJw87c2Xt3qizmItDZmnL9hyfoalvDEwJntXRa45BMfMp694Cvz5cx3H5ge5StbMJVpCKMOBzNZfUqfVMbtJqHoCz51gNaPHlKCjhWHs0ze+6WLsthLEOBoCnT7Bu/Yf0Y1v8ds9j5jaPZhPWGK6lm5sRspPZ+rnFJeZpSRupct2MlNKeFnXeye5TH7YnP4IwTNvCRaSc87RT2MTkV8jl360cVWDgaPWmMd48S0rC+5GKzBUFytO86HWJrFpHQF05moYvcS0RYcg/VY34Gko2tRSXKh5LsAXTwgfyNsT7JZiItw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=IWQTK0aUZF9j7koRNjR05Wwlh49DHerYAnz2HXC7MgQ=; b=Qvb0pkFevivJ/qFap7j3SWSQffdLIvQAjw3bXwbSv1diavaVR7o9zE3W35zzKWsXJm/yptdLEUHp6z/rDAXJiYtLfhzOUdGGFdLAEjYRHMAU/YYGrl3EQgxMSq0thYxhDJsReHsqwury9RApySAGpXLJ9I2O4pnTLkQd0XZQSfnNtyJDm16khboCZhTtrXm/kJNZxijSe3lV/nPGq/mYS+HIa0qCRBwnPWkoK/eAKktRvCnToaxsYXJcqBWQLDbqMkpYcfLpLdmPCpUiRoWeCYvxl4b/ETM6IcTchm7MDl7pEhJKRH8MkUwZgp4p1+bQ8jNCmFlvDycQ7cF7b0vesg==
Received: from AM5EUR03FT016.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e08::40) by AM5EUR03HT131.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e08::510) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.15; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:13:03 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7e08::46) by AM5EUR03FT016.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e08::142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:13:03 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8]) by VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3370.019; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:13:03 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
CC: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
Thread-Index: AQHWjPynobf28KXQhU2b/AtbNAyUFA==
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:13:03 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1P194MB0285AEE49C63F9DF0E18021FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <BA9AA3A6-AD8E-448C-8435-9861ED6DB844@cisco.com> <VI1P194MB02854BE1477807D40AD44E34AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200917140810.GA29793@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20200917140810.GA29793@nic.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:68C63820A259753CC7B6917800C2D99521C6022A21F4F2C226C8A6288EB0B7E4; UpperCasedChecksum:9657DE93957AF9E9FA4661BBE5F046B4B22FCE5F143EC6ED118E3721B655BBEF; SizeAsReceived:7160; Count:44
x-tmn: [qYu+vDtrnl4rT5J4vTmaY+Vyx0m4OEiY]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 08392b84-078e-4d9f-18ce-08d85b13ca84
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5EUR03HT131:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: wdwrblrZf2/F6NjNIPmhNV6aIWw1cCF7dFaSaSJ4OrW0uqli5oY3zMKWUXK42f4ynN0TO1/9v0MfVPEQTrcLO6w2Hnj8qGCsChXMWNvfdYmwYbShPdwsThgdVGR0mz0mhgt4wpZZeW5utorvjvGK9iEDQPSzdMZ1xb+eI8nj5qZu7TB+d8ZpzFP+t9JDsKXywOKJDJxHEpYBmfJj0Ci+UA==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: wuZSRUBURhfYFgNcyTuE/+71XkqEQ+BJy+nW/S//JcJCwNvTGYkfOjdZttbaWT0batVDg9NYb8QrvAkOtX0QhTdMMZr8xxHWhC54zmhLG/rW+mSDFUsrAxBh9ZlezxPgCt6Vq8JeQ78i2RpmG4Yj8A==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM5EUR03FT016.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 08392b84-078e-4d9f-18ce-08d85b13ca84
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Sep 2020 14:13:03.1806 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5EUR03HT131
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/iilzJYkAOfFEsf0NwXU3PFADhIU>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:13:16 -0000

>> No, most of the feedback you received was to explain why it is a bad idea from the beginning and why your premises, your reasoning and your conclusion are all false.

Why it is a bad idea ?????!!!!!

IPv6 requires updating and migration.
IPv10 requires only updating.

IPv6 took so long time.
IPv10 will take short time.

IPv6 is a new address structure.
IPv10 is a solution only.

Other transitioning techniques requires so much translations and involvement of the DNS in the communication process.
IPv10 doesn't requires neither.

Other transitioning techniques requires training.
IPv10 requires no training. 

Best regards,

Khaled Omar

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 4:08 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>; int-area <int-area@ietf.org>; intarea-chairs@ietf.org; Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:58:21PM +0000,  Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote  a message of 122 lines which said:

> Most of the feedbacks I got are related to changing the draft name 
> from IPv10 to any other name.

No, most of the feedback you received was to explain why it is a bad idea from the beginning and why your premises, your reasoning and your conclusion are all false.

No need to spend meeting time on it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email