Re: SIP now IPv6
Hans-Werner Braun <hwb@upeksa.sdsc.edu> Fri, 25 December 1992 00:30 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05348; 24 Dec 92 19:30 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05344; 24 Dec 92 19:30 EST
Received: from Sun.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22497; 24 Dec 92 19:33 EST
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (zigzag-bb.Corp.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA22349; Thu, 24 Dec 92 16:30:43 PST
Received: from sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA19641; Thu, 24 Dec 92 16:30:45 PST
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engmail1) by sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09851; Thu, 24 Dec 92 16:30:29 PST
Received: from Sun.COM (sun-barr) by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA27736; Thu, 24 Dec 92 16:30:37 PST
Received: from upeksa.sdsc.edu by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA22341; Thu, 24 Dec 92 16:30:29 PST
Received: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 16:29:49 -0800 by upeksa.sdsc.edu (AIX/1.6)
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Hans-Werner Braun <hwb@upeksa.sdsc.edu>
Message-Id: <9212250029.AA15324@upeksa.sdsc.edu>
Subject: Re: SIP now IPv6
To: "Vinton G. Cerf" <vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 16:29:49 -0800
Cc: dlynch@interop.com, Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr, postel@isi.edu, sip@caldera.usc.edu, ip-encaps@sunroof.eng.sun.com, iana@isi.edu, iab@isi.edu
In-Reply-To: <9212241200.aa02971@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>; from "Vinton G. Cerf" at Dec 24, 92 12:00 pm
Content-Length: 869
Vint: >as a purely practical matter, how can we do anything but provide an >assignment to avoid collision among different IP proposals - given >we want to test in live environments where possible? Besides the comments Dave Katz made, which seem to make sense to me, if this is for experimental protocol, one could choose any number but four, I guess. How about version one? How much of a conflict would there be? Besides, experiments should be first demonstrated in a private sandbox anyway, where the version number won't matter much. Or Jon could assign some version number for "any experimental version." Besides that, I agree with Dave Crocker in that SIPers/IPAEers are politizising by getting a formal number assignment out of a sparse space earlyon. And trying to win PR battles with immediate announcements, as was just demonstrated yesterday. Hans-Werner
- SIP now IPv6 Bob Hinden
- SIP now IPv6 Jon Postel
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dave Crocker
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Christian Huitema
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dan Lynch
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Hans-Werner Braun
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Vinton G. Cerf
- SIP now IPv6 Dave Katz
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dave Crocker
- SIP now IPv6 Dave Katz
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Hans-Werner Braun
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Noel Chiappa
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dave Crocker
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dave Crocker
- SIP now IPv6 Dave Katz
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Hans-Werner Braun
- My "heated message to the IAB." Hans-Werner Braun
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Noel Chiappa
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Bob Braden
- SIP now IPv6 Dave Katz
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dave Crocker
- Re: SIP now IPv6 peter
- Re: SIP now IPv6 John Curran
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Steve Deering
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Steve Deering
- SIP now IPv6 yakov
- SIP now IPv6 yakov
- SIP now IPv6 yakov
- SIP now IPv6 yakov
- Re: SIP now IPv6 John Curran
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Steve Deering
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Steve Deering
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dan Lynch
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dave Crocker
- SIP now IPv6 yakov
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dave Crocker
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Noel Chiappa
- Re: My "heated message to the IAB." Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Frank Kastenholz
- Re: SIP now IPv6 peter
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Dave Crocker
- Re: SIP now IPv6 peter
- Re: SIP now IPv6 Jon Crowcroft