SIP now IPv6

Dave Katz <dkatz@cisco.com> Sat, 26 December 1992 19:06 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02088; 26 Dec 92 14:06 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02084; 26 Dec 92 14:06 EST
Received: from Sun.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12394; 26 Dec 92 14:09 EST
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (zigzag-bb.Corp.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA26180; Sat, 26 Dec 92 11:09:05 PST
Received: from sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA29878; Sat, 26 Dec 92 11:09:04 PST
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engmail1) by sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA27231; Sat, 26 Dec 92 11:08:52 PST
Received: from Sun.COM (sun-barr) by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA07777; Sat, 26 Dec 92 11:08:56 PST
Received: from regal.cisco.com by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA26175; Sat, 26 Dec 92 11:08:51 PST
Received: by regal.cisco.com; Sat, 26 Dec 92 11:08:48 -0800
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 11:08:48 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dave Katz <dkatz@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <9212261908.AA19454@regal.cisco.com>
To: braden@isi.edu
Cc: dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu, vcerf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, sip@caldera.usc.edu, ip-encaps@sunroof.eng.sun.com, iana@isi.edu, iab%ISI.EDUDUI@sun.com, he@isi.edu
In-Reply-To: Bob Braden's message of Sat, 26 Dec 1992 09:42:56 -0800 <199212261742.AA16861@zephyr.isi.edu>
Subject: SIP now IPv6
Content-Length: 411

CLNP does indeed have a version number, and I would suspect that changing the
version would have a similar level of exposure as changing the version of IP
(adjusted for the number of deployed systems, of course... ;-) )

   Is all this fuss simply because CLNP doesn't have a version number?
   [At the moment, I don't recall whether it does or not, but I'm *sure*
   someone will enlighten me very quickly!]