RE: Advancing the Protocol and Morin Drafts

"NAPIERALA, MARIA H, ATTLABS" <mnapierala@att.com> Tue, 07 October 2008 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: l3vpn-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-l3vpn-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5401B3A6B6C; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: l3vpn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836993A6B6C for <l3vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R0Ke6Kj3Cgxs for <l3vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com (mail121.messagelabs.com [216.82.245.115]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B663A6B4D for <l3vpn@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: mnapierala@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1223389128!27066214!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.54]
Received: (qmail 12734 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2008 14:18:48 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp7.sbc.com (HELO mlpi135.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.54) by server-7.tower-121.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Oct 2008 14:18:48 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpi135.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m97EImqG000347; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:18:48 -0400
Received: from misout7msgusr7e.ugd.att.com (misout7msgusr7e.ugd.att.com [144.155.43.107]) by mlpi135.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m97EIgro032760; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:18:42 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Advancing the Protocol and Morin Drafts
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:18:42 -0400
Message-ID: <2F1DE4DFCFF32144B771BD2C246E6A20A5F2B4@misout7msgusr7e.ugd.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <81F49736-BA49-4CBC-9437-BEC475B3E53F@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Advancing the Protocol and Morin Drafts
Thread-Index: Ackj4TY8c3HtZpcNRv28NbkV8+HYTAEpe9GA
References: <A834346E-E29F-4CD5-94AF-D6B99D1E2D42@multicasttech.com><1222877148.28824.45.camel@l-at11168.FTRD> <81F49736-BA49-4CBC-9437-BEC475B3E53F@cisco.com>
From: "NAPIERALA, MARIA H, ATTLABS" <mnapierala@att.com>
To: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>, Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange-ftgroup.com>
Cc: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, l3vpn@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/l3vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org

I agree with Dave. What is needed is a complete and solid requirements
draft representing service providers offering MVPN service. The
recommendations draft is not going to be useful.

Maria

>-----Original Message-----
>From: l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] 
>On Behalf Of David Ward
>Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 12:16 PM
>To: Thomas Morin
>Cc: Ross Callon; David Ward; l3vpn@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: Advancing the Protocol and Morin Drafts
>
>Should #2 come before #1?
>
>-DWard
>
>On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Thomas Morin wrote:
>
>> Support this approach.
>>
>> (detailed input from chairs will be welcome on the precise changes  
>> that
>> are needed.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Thomas
>>
>> Marshall Eubanks :
>>> This email starts a 3 week call for input, to expire October 23,  
>>> 2008,
>>> for the following steps:
>>>
>>> 1.) To accept draft-morin-l3vpn-mvpn-considerations-03 as a working
>>> group document;  and
>>>
>>> 2.) To turn this document into a requirements draft, with  
>>> mandatory to
>>> implement features for an interoperable implementation. The authors
>>> have indicated that they are willing to do this.
>>>
>>> Our intention is, if this approach is accepted, to then 
>begin WG last
>>> call to submit to the IESG for publication:
>>>
>>> draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast
>>> draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast-bgp
>>>
>>> We expect that these two documents will be submitted more or less  
>>> as is
>>> (i.e., certainly with any new bug fixes or other necessary  
>>> corrections
>>> and
>>> improvements, but without specific mandatory to implement feature
>>> description in those drafts).
>>>
>>> Please respond to the list with your recommendations for these two
>>> courses of action.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Marshall & Danny
>>>
>>
>
>