IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Mon, 18 September 2006 04:44 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPAzK-0006J7-82; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:44:10 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPAzI-0006Iz-WB for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:44:09 -0400
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPAzH-0007PE-MB for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:44:08 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GPAz5-0004MR-Bs for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:43:55 +0200
Received: from pd9fba907.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.251.169.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:43:55 +0200
Received: from nobody by pd9fba907.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:43:55 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:43:22 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <450E23EA.3A10@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <E1GOtou-0002Yt-JL@megatron.ietf.org> <012001c6da7a$a95c46a0$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <450DF53A.380@xyzzy.claranet.de> <20060918013646.GK3003@ccil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9fba907.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc:
Subject: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

John Cowan wrote:
 
> How is zh-hakka different from zh-xiang or zh-guoyu (except
> that the latter is deprecated)?

zh-xiang etc. are not referenced anywhere.  zh-hakka has a
reference from i-hak, it appears in a Preferred-Value field.

Similarly zh-cmn appears in the Preferred-Value of zh-guoyu,
and at the moment there's no subtag cmn.  A dangling pointer.

Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email