IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] problem statement

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 07 September 2011 00:11 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCF221F8CF5 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XPqsJ33bFsJT for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AA321F8CE4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so17307618pzk.18 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aCBChLoHWxYoEHKGo4pZZTwN0ef89BEMY+4AxqwwRMM=; b=RELSKZkQ+pJ0CF0LUGYE637V8UrJpJIpWy3AU5LG1JXJUYHPL7zrtwcovtz7V67AMn Tc17GAeOgXvkNInRaPVwdkJ4nmLvlNHmDcs1unXMRArgQAHzxkR3xRsLVI2c5ssUNHcD T8jE2YPQsy1n+mzq96C9pQ3kPnvO7/kCkXeZw=
Received: by 10.68.33.98 with SMTP id q2mr10952323pbi.449.1315354405903; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [137.229.12.236] (drake.swits.alaska.edu. [137.229.12.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e8sm735217pbc.8.2011.09.06.17.13.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E66B72D.9070207@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:13:33 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
References: <4E665B25.6090709@mtcc.com> <4E6661FA.7050804@alcatel-lucent.com> <CD0B1909-8298-4CC3-B273-7B26E71EAB31@hueniverse.com> <4E666512.7010701@mtcc.com> <F4839FCD-CA73-4450-AD12-E07D46BB7746@hueniverse.com> <4E6667D1.3080404@mtcc.com> <1315334677.26387.YahooMailNeo@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E666B65.30701@mtcc.com> <29815937-0FB9-463B-B6E4-8FCAF7B3CD8C@hueniverse.com> <4E666E73.3050502@mtcc.com> <CAMrm-MJHKTxaj1iEm_Lr=X92sOiWZcYN4F6dNqb5w5gh4OPndQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E6671FA.3090503@gmail.com> <4E667469.2040007@mtcc.com> <1315337809.3136.38.camel@ground> <4E667953.9020906@mtcc.com> <71A460EE-1E2C-4165-99A8-5A97D6E9365C@jkemp.net> <4E667E2E.7090304@mtcc.com> <80A88920-A1EF-4A1C-A97E-F99379923CFB@jkemp.net> <4E66845E.7090906@mtcc.com> <E3DEC4C8-6BB0-44EE-821A-7589F5DC6462@jkemp.net> <4E669D3C.5000900@gmail.com> <7D4DF72E-B211-4D41-B447-4CF04E9CB1D8@hueniverse.com> <4E66B53A.9030609@mtcc.com> <04958686-64CE-46C5-B095-F70BE7225BAA@hueniverse.com>
In-Reply-To: <04958686-64CE-46C5-B095-F70BE7225BAA@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] problem statement
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:11:38 -0000

On 09/06/2011 04:09 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> Wg consensus is clearly to do nothing here.

??  No, it clearly is not, unless you're laboring
under the misconception that "consensus" means "voting."
At any rate the job of calling consensus *explicitly*
belongs to working group chairs, not editors.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email