IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] problem statement

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Wed, 07 September 2011 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@mtcc.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A5821F8C89 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sVsTUU4ShtcG for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtcc.com (mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA0F21F8E03 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from takifugu.mtcc.com (takifugu.mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by mtcc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p871Rpqp014708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:27:52 -0700
Message-ID: <4E66C897.703@mtcc.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:27:51 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
References: <4E665B25.6090709@mtcc.com> <CD0B1909-8298-4CC3-B273-7B26E71EAB31@hueniverse.com> <4E666512.7010701@mtcc.com> <F4839FCD-CA73-4450-AD12-E07D46BB7746@hueniverse.com> <4E6667D1.3080404@mtcc.com> <1315334677.26387.YahooMailNeo@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E666B65.30701@mtcc.com> <29815937-0FB9-463B-B6E4-8FCAF7B3CD8C@hueniverse.com> <4E666E73.3050502@mtcc.com> <CAMrm-MJHKTxaj1iEm_Lr=X92sOiWZcYN4F6dNqb5w5gh4OPndQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E6671FA.3090503@gmail.com> <4E667469.2040007@mtcc.com> <1315337809.3136.38.camel@ground> <4E667953.9020906@mtcc.com> <71A460EE-1E2C-4165-99A8-5A97D6E9365C@jkemp.net> <4E667E2E.7090304@mtcc.com> <80A88920-A1EF-4A1C-A97E-F99379923CFB@jkemp.net> <4E66845E.7090906@mtcc.com> <E3DEC4C8-6BB0-44EE-821A-7589F5DC6462@jkemp.net> <4E669D3C.5000900@gmail.com> <4E66B964.2060808@stpeter.im> <4E66BFF0.9020008@gmail.com> <4E66C407.9090209@stpeter.im> <4E66C521.5070804@mtcc.com> <BE965137-7EC9-4F92-945C-AD39066211E5@hueniverse.com>
In-Reply-To: <BE965137-7EC9-4F92-945C-AD39066211E5@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=488; t=1315358872; x=1316222872; c=relaxed/simple; s=thundersaddle.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[OAUTH-WG]=20problem=20statement |Sender:=20 |To:=20Eran=20Hammer-Lahav=20<eran@hueniverse.com> |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20 format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=ZD1EOIh2yoQFHqbSgDhs9CnDAM9FlV36HX96fb8weGw=; b=UZggSLO+DJFfOzsMjSg//POd4t9JAbK12X/hkBkf3DRBAZX+FEgGtuY5HJ L/l07qp62GmuQPDsbyK1h4nxVs1y446jYKrEj5FB6IGD3hGsv7htUjyYXPZH ezmZWC27vf6eu3D3U2tz7wigO4e5GIXIr0O2PPl5HhD/Vjl8+4EdM=;
Authentication-Results: ; v=0.1; dkim=pass header.i=mike@mtcc.com ( sig from mtcc.com/thundersaddle.kirkwood verified; ); dkim-asp=pass header.From=mike@mtcc.com
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] problem statement
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 01:26:06 -0000

On 09/06/2011 06:24 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> You clearly feel strongly about this. The only way forward if you want to pursue this is to suggest text and show how providing it will lead to more secure implementations. Otherwise this is just going in circles.
>    

Didn't you just get done announcing how you weren't going to do anything
under any circumstances unless you were forced to by the chairs? I think
I'll wait for them to chime in before I waste my time.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email