IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] problem statement

Aiden Bell <aiden449@gmail.com> Wed, 07 September 2011 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <aiden449@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5FD21F8D0C for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.322
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.322 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.276, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2TvkMCUtf0J0 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8BC21F8CF3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so4859230qyk.10 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UIBybwgtnHnl4Jvqek1lIGzkxaXI2CQKIDEbZWxJc2o=; b=EuUXke3t9p6y99OsokDgUfIifjILYwY/KYwTLa7OHzC3gNxMWPXlRzQqORWksjHN7Z pR4buOSns5DLF6CZFKDsdIOrcyrKtaowDdk+8LHcUkMq2VNuAGPOWr3LpNjf+utC1ijr Rh4GNGYOT/P2U5BsmDZgoE/O3A+unBa5viWXk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.221.147 with SMTP id ic19mr5157041qab.293.1315423855358; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.249.71 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E67C501.3060001@mtcc.com>
References: <4E665B25.6090709@mtcc.com> <CD0B1909-8298-4CC3-B273-7B26E71EAB31@hueniverse.com> <4E666512.7010701@mtcc.com> <F4839FCD-CA73-4450-AD12-E07D46BB7746@hueniverse.com> <4E6667D1.3080404@mtcc.com> <1315334677.26387.YahooMailNeo@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E666B65.30701@mtcc.com> <29815937-0FB9-463B-B6E4-8FCAF7B3CD8C@hueniverse.com> <4E666E73.3050502@mtcc.com> <CAMrm-MJHKTxaj1iEm_Lr=X92sOiWZcYN4F6dNqb5w5gh4OPndQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E6671FA.3090503@gmail.com> <4E667469.2040007@mtcc.com> <1315337809.3136.38.camel@ground> <4E667953.9020906@mtcc.com> <71A460EE-1E2C-4165-99A8-5A97D6E9365C@jkemp.net> <4E667E2E.7090304@mtcc.com> <80A88920-A1EF-4A1C-A97E-F99379923CFB@jkemp.net> <4E66845E.7090906@mtcc.com> <E3DEC4C8-6BB0-44EE-821A-7589F5DC6462@jkemp.net> <4E669D3C.5000900@gmail.com> <7D4DF72E-B211-4D41-B447-4CF04E9CB1D8@hueniverse.com> <4E67A710.9070505@alcatel-lucent.com> <4E67A942.1070200@mtcc.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234518A4F274E@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <4E67C501.3060001@mtcc.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:30:55 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+5SmTWRsYR-7S8tsOqUPLxEG7FCoWjfYiWzhS7D6jHmJAk-iA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aiden Bell <aiden449@gmail.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf306f733aa0b12604ac5efb4b"
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] problem statement
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:29:06 -0000

On 7 September 2011 20:24, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:

> On 09/07/2011 12:12 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
>
> [more browbeating elided]
>
>
>  In fact, you guys have convinced me that OAuth gives inferior protection
>> at
>>
>>> considerable expense for all concerned.
>>>
>>>
>> an irresponsible and serious offense - the kind of baseless FUD that can
>> cause real damage to important work.
>>
>>
>
> I have written down at least 3 or 4 times why I think it's inferior.
>
But no proposed solution or anything constructive past arguing with people
who understand and are only here to help.
Helping people who don't listen or appear to show any tact in the face of
opposing concensus is hard.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Never send sensitive or private information via email unless it is
encrypted. http://www.gnupg.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email