IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] problem statement

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Wed, 07 September 2011 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@mtcc.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0192521F8D97 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VD22PZ+X225y for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtcc.com (mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E54821F8CB1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from takifugu.mtcc.com (takifugu.mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by mtcc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p870FoTr022796 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:15:51 -0700
Message-ID: <4E66B7B6.6080305@mtcc.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:15:50 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
References: <4E665B25.6090709@mtcc.com> <4E6661FA.7050804@alcatel-lucent.com> <CD0B1909-8298-4CC3-B273-7B26E71EAB31@hueniverse.com> <4E666512.7010701@mtcc.com> <F4839FCD-CA73-4450-AD12-E07D46BB7746@hueniverse.com> <4E6667D1.3080404@mtcc.com> <1315334677.26387.YahooMailNeo@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E666B65.30701@mtcc.com> <29815937-0FB9-463B-B6E4-8FCAF7B3CD8C@hueniverse.com> <4E666E73.3050502@mtcc.com> <CAMrm-MJHKTxaj1iEm_Lr=X92sOiWZcYN4F6dNqb5w5gh4OPndQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E6671FA.3090503@gmail.com> <4E667469.2040007@mtcc.com> <1315337809.3136.38.camel@ground> <4E667953.9020906@mtcc.com> <71A460EE-1E2C-4165-99A8-5A97D6E9365C@jkemp.net> <4E667E2E.7090304@mtcc.com> <80A88920-A1EF-4A1C-A97E-F99379923CFB@jkemp.net> <4E66845E.7090906@mtcc.com> <E3DEC4C8-6BB0-44EE-821A-7589F5DC6462@jkemp.net> <4E669D3C.5000900@gmail.com> <7D4DF72E-B211-4D41-B447-4CF04E9CB1D8@hueniverse.com> <4E66B53A.9030609@mtcc.com> <04958686-64CE-46C5-B095-F70BE7225BAA@hueniverse.com>
In-Reply-To: <04958686-64CE-46C5-B095-F70BE7225BAA@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=669; t=1315354551; x=1316218551; c=relaxed/simple; s=thundersaddle.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[OAUTH-WG]=20problem=20statement |Sender:=20 |To:=20Eran=20Hammer-Lahav=20<eran@hueniverse.com> |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20 format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=2E3J2DPqvYtIxXPMRoMyhJ3IYfzA222yje1iQ/Ccfzk=; b=sNLYQ3R/SUVEPQTUpuc6i6B85GAQcMsm1p8fTajZa1j2nEleaqxajLGtCS 3PBcQWTzMgWEL1/TzcwAcY2oMMj/XCnSdtfeHku0IJGoVlZ/A2n8h+ls5iQi Dlv1FHW0rXoyLCMw1YF1vxr1w5kir9Y2AOj0BDG8YtdLa8mq3jXew=;
Authentication-Results: ; v=0.1; dkim=pass header.i=mike@mtcc.com ( sig from mtcc.com/thundersaddle.kirkwood verified; ); dkim-asp=pass header.From=mike@mtcc.com
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] problem statement
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:14:07 -0000

On 09/06/2011 05:09 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> Wg consensus is clearly to do nothing here.
>    

Perhaps you are new to IETF process, but your job is to
put into the document what the chairs call as consensus.
Even if you disagree. Even vehemently.

Mike

> EHL
>
> On Sep 6, 2011, at 17:05, "Michael Thomas"<mike@mtcc.com>  wrote:
>
>    
>> On 09/06/2011 03:27 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
>>      
>>> So yeah, unless you can prove that there is an actual problem, we are done.
>>>
>>>        
>> I will point out that the chairs make that determination based on
>> working group consensus, not the document editor.
>>
>> Mike
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email