Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Hi Dan,

Since we don't have an external request to review any of the new drafts yet,
we also do not have hard deadlines, so I think that Vancouver +1 or 2 weeks 
is fine.

I listed -rtcweb-rtp-usage twice to show how fast this draft is advancing,
3 updates since IETF-87, so we should try to catch-up with this one quickly.

Al

________________________________________
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [dromasca@avaya.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 9:05 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Benoit Claise; pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Oh, I see, I missed the fact that you are looking for volunteers only for these marked as NEW.

Out of the 5, two are from xrblock which I am chairing. We are left with three which are actually two because you list two different versions of draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage (7 and 10). Let me take this one - same question about deadline for review.

Regards,

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) [mailto:acmorton@att.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 2:57 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Benoit Claise; pm-dir@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> It's up to Benoit if he wants to add more reviews, but I've already
> reviewed that draft for pm-dir (and was recently asked to check if my
> review was resolved - it was).
>
> oam-overview is not marked as "<<< NEW", but about 5 other drafts are...
>
> regards,
> Al
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [dromasca@avaya.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 7:19 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Benoit Claise; pm-dir@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
>
> Hi Al,
>
> I can review draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview, this is a document that I
> am following anyway. My understanding is that it does not define new
> metrics, but touches some performance measurements issues as part of the
> overview. What is the deadline? I hope Vancouver +1 week at least,
> otherwise I cannot commit to anything.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:29 AM
> > To: Benoit Claise; pm-dir@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
> >
> > pm-dir,
> >
> > After the submission deadline, I was able to run a diff on the drafts
> > which reference 6390 or use the term "performance metric". This diff
> > compares the doc state back to the IETF-87 deadline.
> >
> > There are about five new drafts we can review, noted below.
> > Please volunteer, I will list these on the google drive spread sheet
> > ASAP.
> >
> > Al
> > pm-dir admin
> >
> > [system@dell4-4 pm-dir]$ cat diff.txt
> > Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
> > --------------------
> > --- pmol-old-content.txt        2013-07-19
> > +++ pmol-uniq-content.txt       2013-10-25 13:28:11.141044525 -0400
> > @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
> > -draft-ietf-alto-deployments-07                    Active
> >
> > Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>
> > +draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08
> >                        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Waiting
> > for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed> @@ -11,9 +12,6 @@
> > -draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-09                 In IESG processing
> -
> > ID
> > Tracker state <AD Evaluation>
> > -draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-01          Active
> >
> > -draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-07                    Active <<< NEW
> >
> > +draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active
> > +draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active
> >
> > +draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active  <<< NEW
> >
> > +draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active  <<< NEW
> >
> > +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active <<< NEW
> >
> > @@ -21,2 +19 @@
> > -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-10                 Active
> > -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-11        In IESG processing
> -
> > ID
> > Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> > +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing
> -
> > ID
> > Tracker state <Publication Requested>
> >
> > @@ -23,0 +21 @@
> > +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active  <<< NEW
> > [system@dell4-4 pm-dir]$
> > ________________________________________
> > From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 6:06 PM
> > To: pm-dir@ietf.org
> > Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > This is an automatically generated email.
> > It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as
> > a normative or informative reference.
> > It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance
> > metric".
> >
> > Regards, Benoit
> >
> > ===========================================================
> >
> > Normative References
> > --------------------
> > draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active
> >
> > Informative References
> > ----------------------
> > draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing -
> > ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-06     Active
> >
> > drafts containing performance metric
> > ------------------------------------
> > draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08                    Active
> > draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active
> > draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01                    Active
> > draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01                      Active
> > draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01            Active
> > draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-04                   Active
> > draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
> > draft-ietf-lmap-framework-01                      Active
> > draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-00                      Active
> > draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08                       In IESG processing -
> > ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>
> > draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-03                      Active
> > draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active
> > draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active
> > draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active
> > draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active
> > draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing -
> > ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-06     Active
> > draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active
> > _______________________________________________
> > pm-dir mailing list
> > pm-dir@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
> > _______________________________________________
> > pm-dir mailing list
> > pm-dir@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir