IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pm-dir] Fwd: Re: Performance metrics doctors generated email

"MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Fri, 24 May 2013 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C615921F8EA4 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.373
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.226, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B6N03dF+S+3Y for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AC721F8CEC for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B541207CA; Thu, 23 May 2013 20:14:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com [135.207.177.33]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7854F0370; Thu, 23 May 2013 20:14:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com ([fe80::3598:75fe:b400:9299]) by njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com ([fe80::3598:75fe:b400:9299%11]) with mapi; Thu, 23 May 2013 20:14:33 -0400
From: "MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 20:14:32 -0400
Thread-Topic: [pm-dir] Fwd: Re: Performance metrics doctors generated email
Thread-Index: Ac5YBOloeRfMk1YUSX2vIqHdOZyQHQADSNLF
Message-ID: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F20EB12@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
References: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B8F4454@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>, <519E8E13.9090002@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <519E8E13.9090002@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Fred Baker <Fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Fwd: Re: Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 00:14:40 -0000

Nice, a few paragraphs from the draft provide enough context 
to see if the use of "performance metric" is something the Directorate
should consider.  Thanks Fred.

As I've said in the past, if we were running Fred's script weekly,
we would need to consider only on the diffs from last week,
so we can add new reviewer assignments.  Since this benefits me
the most, I'd be willing to add the differencing lines to the script...

Without carping on too long here, we have quite a few outstanding assignments
and drafts needing volunteers to review:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE#gid=0

regards,
Al

________________________________________
From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 5:45 PM
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Cc: Fred Baker
Subject: [pm-dir] Fwd: Re:  Performance metrics doctors generated email

Dear pm-dir,

Some more help from Fred.
All the drafts containing "performance metrics", along with the specific
section.
That should help identifying the drafts that are important to review.

Regards, Benoit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email