Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 28 October 2013 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EE521E8063 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tzhQx5G0EA+8 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2905711E8272 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6382; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382965759; x=1384175359; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WPdqbsO5pe04ihQn38qHasFLphzY0oxK71Kt1PTe1KM=; b=FuBYHNybwnTiG1ydxUWGn9M6xFOREC6g+kLbVh7OCoEljoC4xdEpZgU+ Uooehu88Ev1wa9elpOTcb9E6p9Le3ObbnSCOJhMTdlDV6i25rf/h86b6b I6ozRSWG1Ipdb2BlGIfnXqZxmmCg7Ksd1ySYay81RwnMr4L6D2zKCrv0v w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4gANJgblKQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4uCSHFIEiFnSCJQEBAQQBAQE1NgoBDAQLEQQBAQoWCAcJAwIBAgEVHwkIBg0BBQIBAYgDDbgVBI4MgRYzBwaEJgOYCoY7i0yDJzuBNQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,586,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="19068241"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2013 13:09:17 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9SD9CiL021951; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:09:14 GMT
Message-ID: <526E61F8.5020800@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:09:12 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
References: <20131027220610.GA15476@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8ABE015CA@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>, <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA12919F16@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8ABE015CC@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8ABE015CC@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:09:44 -0000

Hi,
> Hi Dan,
>
> It's up to Benoit if he wants to add more reviews,
> but I've already reviewed that draft for pm-dir
> (and was recently asked to check if my review was
> resolved - it was).
Well, it seems that this one is covered from a pm-dir point of view.

Regards, Benoit
>
> oam-overview is not marked as "<<< NEW",
> but about 5 other drafts are...
>
> regards,
> Al
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [dromasca@avaya.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 7:19 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Benoit Claise; pm-dir@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
>
> Hi Al,
>
> I can review draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview, this is a document that I am following anyway. My understanding is that it does not define new metrics, but touches some performance measurements issues as part of the overview. What is the deadline? I hope Vancouver +1 week at least, otherwise I cannot commit to anything.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
>> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:29 AM
>> To: Benoit Claise; pm-dir@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
>>
>> pm-dir,
>>
>> After the submission deadline, I was able to run a diff on the drafts
>> which reference 6390 or use the term "performance metric". This diff
>> compares the doc state back to the IETF-87 deadline.
>>
>> There are about five new drafts we can review, noted below.
>> Please volunteer, I will list these on the google drive spread sheet
>> ASAP.
>>
>> Al
>> pm-dir admin
>>
>> [system@dell4-4 pm-dir]$ cat diff.txt
>> Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
>> --------------------
>> --- pmol-old-content.txt        2013-07-19
>> +++ pmol-uniq-content.txt       2013-10-25 13:28:11.141044525 -0400
>> @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
>> -draft-ietf-alto-deployments-07                    Active
>>
>> Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>
>> +draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08
>>                         In IESG processing - ID
>> Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>
>> @@ -11,9 +12,6 @@
>> -draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-09                 In IESG processing -
>> ID
>> Tracker state <AD Evaluation>
>> -draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-01          Active
>>
>> -draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-07                    Active <<< NEW
>>
>> +draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active
>> +draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active
>>
>> +draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active  <<< NEW
>>
>> +draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active  <<< NEW
>>
>> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active <<< NEW
>>
>> @@ -21,2 +19 @@
>> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-10                 Active
>> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-11        In IESG processing -
>> ID
>> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
>> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing -
>> ID
>> Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>>
>> @@ -23,0 +21 @@
>> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active  <<< NEW
>> [system@dell4-4 pm-dir]$
>> ________________________________________
>> From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 6:06 PM
>> To: pm-dir@ietf.org
>> Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> This is an automatically generated email.
>> It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a
>> normative or informative reference.
>> It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance
>> metric".
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>
>> ===========================================================
>>
>> Normative References
>> --------------------
>> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active
>>
>> Informative References
>> ----------------------
>> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing -
>> ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-06     Active
>>
>> drafts containing performance metric
>> ------------------------------------
>> draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08                    Active
>> draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01                    Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01                      Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01            Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-04                   Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
>> draft-ietf-lmap-framework-01                      Active
>> draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-00                      Active
>> draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08                       In IESG processing -
>> ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>
>> draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-03                      Active
>> draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active
>> draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active
>> draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active
>> draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing -
>> ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-06     Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active
>> _______________________________________________
>> pm-dir mailing list
>> pm-dir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
>> _______________________________________________
>> pm-dir mailing list
>> pm-dir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir.