Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 28 October 2013 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440EB11E8266 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJHSIY95v0rn for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com (ams-iport-3.cisco.com [144.254.224.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4578511E8272 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6074; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382965701; x=1384175301; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ur85w4ldZ0GW+jF89rEGdOVvEndljAsMX3kgVLCvwg0=; b=LmS4JOUnGHrLchCRY+2ufZR5FYiCuLKosHIz6QzbRajol+EOufpXVhlz yFSY+McmIwdAvj9OMhDsZHOEG/iPJbBH0NXRGFiZ95wrC2kSv/En6IjyU Zkm+CSzF729rf+HxhiBKrOhD6YLBC325J718OuVOrVefmgKAWNyK9Ulrp w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4gAJpgblKQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4uCSHFIEiFnSCJQEBAQQBAQE1NgoBDAQLEQQBAQEJFggHCQMCAQIBFR8JCAYNAQUCAQGIAw24FgSODIEWMwcGhCYDmAqGO4tMgyc7gTU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,586,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="18592386"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2013 13:08:20 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9SD8Es9021731; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:08:16 GMT
Message-ID: <526E61BE.9000609@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:08:14 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
References: <20131027220610.GA15476@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C8ABE015CA@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA12919F16@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA12919F16@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:08:28 -0000

On 28/10/2013 12:19, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> I can review draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview, this is a document that I am following anyway. My understanding is that it does not define new metrics, but touches some performance measurements issues as part of the overview.
That's my understanding as well.
However, Dan, since you provided some feedback on that draft in the 
past, and since it improves significantly, I would interested to 
understand if your concerns have been addressed.
Note that this draft will go through OPSAWG WG LC again

Regards, Benoit
> What is the deadline? I hope Vancouver +1 week at least, otherwise I cannot commit to anything.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
>> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:29 AM
>> To: Benoit Claise; pm-dir@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
>>
>> pm-dir,
>>
>> After the submission deadline, I was able to run a diff on the drafts
>> which reference 6390 or use the term "performance metric". This diff
>> compares the doc state back to the IETF-87 deadline.
>>
>> There are about five new drafts we can review, noted below.
>> Please volunteer, I will list these on the google drive spread sheet
>> ASAP.
>>
>> Al
>> pm-dir admin
>>
>> [system@dell4-4 pm-dir]$ cat diff.txt
>> Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
>> --------------------
>> --- pmol-old-content.txt        2013-07-19
>> +++ pmol-uniq-content.txt       2013-10-25 13:28:11.141044525 -0400
>> @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
>> -draft-ietf-alto-deployments-07                    Active
>>
>> Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>
>> +draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08
>>                         In IESG processing - ID
>> Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>
>> @@ -11,9 +12,6 @@
>> -draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-09                 In IESG processing -
>> ID
>> Tracker state <AD Evaluation>
>> -draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-01          Active
>>
>> -draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-07                    Active <<< NEW
>>
>> +draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active
>> +draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active
>>
>> +draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active  <<< NEW
>>
>> +draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active  <<< NEW
>>
>> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active <<< NEW
>>
>> @@ -21,2 +19 @@
>> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-10                 Active
>> -draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-11        In IESG processing -
>> ID
>> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
>> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing -
>> ID
>> Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>>
>> @@ -23,0 +21 @@
>> +draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active  <<< NEW
>> [system@dell4-4 pm-dir]$
>> ________________________________________
>> From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 6:06 PM
>> To: pm-dir@ietf.org
>> Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> This is an automatically generated email.
>> It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a
>> normative or informative reference.
>> It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance
>> metric".
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>
>> ===========================================================
>>
>> Normative References
>> --------------------
>> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active
>>
>> Informative References
>> ----------------------
>> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing -
>> ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-06     Active
>>
>> drafts containing performance metric
>> ------------------------------------
>> draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08                    Active
>> draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-01Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01                    Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01                      Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01            Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-04                   Active
>> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04               Active
>> draft-ietf-lmap-framework-01                      Active
>> draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-00                      Active
>> draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-08                       In IESG processing -
>> ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>
>> draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-03                      Active
>> draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-10                 Active
>> draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-02          Active
>> draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-08                  Active
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10                    Active
>> draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-00                    Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12                 In IESG processing -
>> ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-06     Active
>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xt-discard-metrics-00     Active
>> _______________________________________________
>> pm-dir mailing list
>> pm-dir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
>> _______________________________________________
>> pm-dir mailing list
>> pm-dir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
> .
>