[pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Sun, 15 June 2014 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A32A1B2961 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2u5BJKLAJlGN for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-jap.cisco.com (skinny-sumo.cisco.com [64.104.15.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00A021A009A for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-jap.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5FL6ODx029931 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 06:06:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (sweet-brew-5.cisco.com [144.254.10.206]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5FL65sV015652 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:06:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from bclaise@localhost) by sweet-brew-5.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id s5FL650X028558 for pm-dir@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:06:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:06:05 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: pm-dir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140615210605.GA28547@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/Kg_lmFBCQ7VA0hl3A6LRJnXwtyk
Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:06:30 -0000

Dear all,

This is an automatically generated email.  
It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a normative or informative reference.
It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance metric".

Regards, Benoit

===========================================================

Normative References
--------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
    
Informative References
----------------------
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	

drafts containing performance metric
------------------------------------
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-09                    Active	
draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-10                 Active	
draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-02Active	
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-00                       Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-05                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-02            Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active-00                Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-registry-passive-00               Active	
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05               In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-lmap-framework-06                      Active	
draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-03                      Active	
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-01           Active	
draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-07                      In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>	
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-04              Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-03          Active	
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-09                  In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <In Last Call>	
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-15                    Active	
draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-04                    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-12        In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-post-repair-loss-count-03Active	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-decodability-04    In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::AD Followup>	
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-17                 In IESG processing - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>	
 
::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::
Diffs from Last Time -=old, +=new
--------------------
No differences encountered