Re: [pm-dir] Fwd: Re: Performance metrics doctors generated email

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 24 May 2013 04:07 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C47021F94F9 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 21:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.204, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DNu9MX0Mvg+N for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 21:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA58F21F93F6 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 21:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7260; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1369368436; x=1370578036; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=hYLrk7Ee10VqzfZC0Hag5gh34kHVQH7ZaD+L3bTyuYY=; b=H3MQ6keBYxmvXaGic7Cok110r+V0DTkm58RMOrSWicldOrKFMMI+eTBz MsIBYN4PL4WYhoodXD8Cw4cGivnmZuYnWst32/PZcLvduBe9+87Enh7y3 xj/bU5T3CvwRVpBWPN5foDv3Vie0eU8pj31mgApUlTLWl88m5sqTvjmda 8=;
X-Files: get-refs : 2846
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmoYADXnnlGtJXG//2dsb2JhbABZgwgwuzSGdIELFnSCIwEBAQMBeQULAgEIEQQBAQskAjAdCAIEDgUIBodxCAYMtiOEGo1bgRExB4JzYQOPfohmkBeDD4FxNQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,732,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="214513427"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 May 2013 04:07:15 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4O47FRB017899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 May 2013 04:07:15 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.220]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 23 May 2013 23:07:14 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
Thread-Topic: [pm-dir] Fwd: Re: Performance metrics doctors generated email
Thread-Index: AQHOWBOs0Sy2SHvZB0SicB2nSzHvLJkUC/6A
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 04:07:14 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B8F53D0@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B8F4454@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>, <519E8E13.9090002@cisco.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F20EB12@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F20EB12@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.117]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B8F53D0xmbrcdx09ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 24 May 2013 04:59:34 -0700
Cc: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Fwd: Re: Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 04:07:28 -0000

I'm not sure what you're asking for. If by "Fred's script" you mean the script that Benoit runs, have at it. If you mean the script I ran this morning, it's actually two. I have attached a small perl script I wrote some years ago and find useful; I think of it as a "paragraph grep". It's arguments are

get-refs <file> [-nc] [-word]* [word]*
      The file is a text file
      -nc means to observe case; by default it is case-agnostic
      -<word> means that if the word is present in a paragraph, do NOT export the paragraph 
      <word> means that if the word is present in a paragraph, DO export the paragraph 

It basically prints out paragraphs (in the 1-or-more 60-column line sense) that contain one or more of the <words> and none of the -<words>. A word, by the way, may contain an arbitrary amount of white space including line feeds.

With this in hand, I then wrote

#!/bin/csh
foreach draft ($*)
     echo $draft
     echo ' '
     get-refs $draft 'performance metric'
end

It would be simple enough to pipe that into a file and take a diff -c -w against the previous week's version.


On May 23, 2013, at 5:14 PM, "MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
 wrote:

> Nice, a few paragraphs from the draft provide enough context 
> to see if the use of "performance metric" is something the Directorate
> should consider.  Thanks Fred.
> 
> As I've said in the past, if we were running Fred's script weekly,
> we would need to consider only on the diffs from last week,
> so we can add new reviewer assignments.  Since this benefits me
> the most, I'd be willing to add the differencing lines to the script...
> 
> Without carping on too long here, we have quite a few outstanding assignments
> and drafts needing volunteers to review:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE#gid=0
> 
> regards,
> Al
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise [bclaise@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 5:45 PM
> To: pm-dir@ietf.org
> Cc: Fred Baker
> Subject: [pm-dir] Fwd: Re:  Performance metrics doctors generated email
> 
> Dear pm-dir,
> 
> Some more help from Fred.
> All the drafts containing "performance metrics", along with the specific
> section.
> That should help identifying the drafts that are important to review.
> 
> Regards, Benoit

------------------------------------------------------
8 issues in virtual infrastructure
http://dcrocker.net/#fallacies