Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> Mon, 04 February 2013 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <paitken@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A6A21F8615 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 04:49:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6q1n9C0M96ib for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 04:49:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EA121F85EB for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 04:49:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4836; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1359982194; x=1361191794; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wEUwK6jGTMU3Y1ARMY94RuhRLmPmaTw2h6ZNCg5j7ww=; b=GmI0XpPUE9b+Eny1dyfvtxvg9mcE/GBi1/2nxTeNrvqjdnb0R1IiWTrw GzW24LATmCCb9WcG8pchJUlooIxP82fwVqBbwNbc9NYJN5/zsz9PNh6dD 9BhaMCaMz06ZRLJ1H5sonD7EHNunNEDZ/p/yWy4zS6DM+y1SA+Qni0oDs 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,600,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="150113497"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2013 12:49:53 +0000
Received: from [10.61.85.89] (ams3-vpn-dhcp5466.cisco.com [10.61.85.89]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r14Cnrfo010581; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:49:53 GMT
Message-ID: <510FAE73.1080901@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:49:55 +0000
From: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
References: <20130204115318.GA9086@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> <510FAA8F.4030604@cisco.com> <510FAB65.4080505@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <510FAB65.4080505@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:49:55 -0000

Benoit,

> Yes, all these questions are important.
> Yes a WIKI is the right solution IMHO.

Great. Where can it be hosted?

eg, is http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/pmol/trac/wiki a good starting 
place? Or is there a pm-dir page?

P.

>> Benoit, All,
>>
>> How is pm-dir tracking these drafts? ie, how do we know whether 
>> someone is currently reviewing, or has already reviewed, each of 
>> these drafts?
>>
>> How are reviewers selected? By relevance, skill, luck, or misfortune?
>>
>> Also, it'd be useful to know whether the previous version was already 
>> reviewed, and what the feedback was:
>>
>>     * issues were raised, recommendations were made, changes were 
>> expected -> some re-review should be done
>>
>>     * no issues were raised -> a quick review of the delta may be 
>> sufficient, to check for any new issues
>>
>>     * previous version wasn't reviewed -> a thorough review may be 
>> required.
>>
>>
>> I'm thinking it'd be useful to have a pm-dir wiki listing each of the 
>> drafts below. eg, one page per draft, with one section per version, 
>> containing reviewer comments pertinent to that version, even if the 
>> comments simply say, "reviewed, no issues".
>>
>> Hopefully I missed something, and most (if not all?) of this is 
>> already in place? :-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> P.
>>
>>
>> On 04/02/13 11:53, Benoit Claise wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> This is an automatically generated email.
>>> It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, 
>>> as a normative or informative reference.
>>> It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance 
>>> metric".
>>>
>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>
>>> ===========================================================
>>>
>>> Normative References
>>> --------------------
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-05 Active
>>>      Informative References
>>> ----------------------
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-10   In IESG processing 
>>> - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-08      In IESG processing 
>>> - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec-03             Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07        Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-11             Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-07                  Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-04        Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-03                 Active
>>>
>>> drafts containing performance metric
>>> ------------------------------------
>>> draft-ietf-alto-deployments-05                    Active
>>> draft-ietf-alto-protocol-13                       In IESG processing 
>>> - ID Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed>
>>> draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-02                   Active
>>> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-01               Active
>>> draft-ietf-karp-threats-reqs-07                   In IESG processing 
>>> - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
>>> draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-mib-05                    Active
>>> draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-06                       Active
>>> draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback-27               In IESG processing 
>>> - ID Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
>>> draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-01                      Active
>>> draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08                 In IESG processing 
>>> - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed>
>>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-05                    Active
>>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02                  Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-10   In IESG processing 
>>> - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-08      In IESG processing 
>>> - ID Tracker state <Publication Requested>
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec-03             Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07        Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-11             Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-05 Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-07                  Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-04        Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-03                 Active
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-06        In IESG processing 
>>> - ID Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead>
>>> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-02     Active
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pm-dir mailing list
>>> pm-dir@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pm-dir mailing list
>> pm-dir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
>>
>>