Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

"Jan Novak (janovak)" <janovak@cisco.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <janovak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8859C21F909A for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 06:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J9LHKbXQfbFH for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 06:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F4821F9D70 for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 06:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7914; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375105767; x=1376315367; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=s0xlzLRBZeG7YhsVLwr8niJv6N0PtTFrSVe7sGe/VbM=; b=E8Kjv9h3ZRqSbWoNmF1e+u+pZfqddojLorAbefeKx5xmVSXbmZ0T1zxP tr5+7V9nPYOfW4gPJe2eYqw3Dd7KQWpnqE9U28wFXAyMZXmnHaCNYA4GT 6r6wJZ4u4MLGJT025OcOtlcjMDmNUo+DNBlxksZ0BN22GRNJYW7FabL/8 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuwGAOtx9lGtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABbgwY1ULZXhwGBFxZ0giQBAQEEAQEBNzQXBAIBCBEEAQEBChQJBycLFAkIAgQBEgiHeg4Ms3WEEwSOPoEOBjIGgxJvA6gjgQiDFIFxOQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,769,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="240810376"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2013 13:49:26 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6TDnQiN011403 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:49:26 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.140]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:49:26 -0500
From: "Jan Novak (janovak)" <janovak@cisco.com>
To: "MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
Thread-Index: Ac6A1gRoardDE6ByRderzvnOjSmoMADrJq1wAcYUQPgAJfwGAAAK0APwAADlnAQAAB5WgA==
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:49:25 +0000
Message-ID: <F45DBC0B6261374F8F8D3AF620413DFED60C1D@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com>
References: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1CA4D677FB@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com> <CE1A9C71.530DE%alan.d.clark@telchemy.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1CA4F509A6@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>, <F45DBC0B6261374F8F8D3AF620413DFED60A55@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1CA4C6DC33@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1CA4C6DC33@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.110.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:49:37 -0000

Hi,

I could do that one - but is it different to what Alan is already doing ?

draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-	Alan C.

Jan

The climate of Edinburgh is such that the weak succumb young, and the strong envy them ....
                                 Dr. Johnson


-----Original Message-----
From: MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL) [mailto:acmorton@att.com] 
Sent: 29 July 2013 14:44
To: Jan Novak (janovak); Benoit Claise (bclaise); pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Hi Jan,

There is another ppsp draft
draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-0*

can you take that one?
Al
________________________________________
From: Jan Novak (janovak) [janovak@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 9:20 AM
To: MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL); Benoit Claise (bclaise); pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Al,

I was looking to volunteer for one but with the two ppsp drafts all is allocated now ??

Jan

The climate of Edinburgh is such that the weak succumb young, and the strong envy them ....
                                 Dr. Johnson


-----Original Message-----
From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: 29 July 2013 09:14
To: Alan Clark; Benoit Claise (bclaise); pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Thanks Alan, I have updated the tracking sheet.

There are a few more drafts needing volunteer reviewers, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE&usp=sharing

if you don't see your name, please volunteer!

regards,
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Clark [mailto:alan.d.clark@telchemy.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 10:01 AM
> To: MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL); Benoit Claise; pm-dir@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
>
> Al
>
> I volunteer to review the two ppsp drafts
>
> Regards
>
> Alan
>
>
> On 7/19/13 9:40 AM, "Al Morton" <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
>
> > I have updated the tracking spread sheet:
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5b
> FJvV
> Uhta
> > 3VLSjl3SkE&usp=sharing
> > and the diff on performance-related drafts is attached.
> >
> > You'll note there are now 2 worksheets, one for in-progress reviews 
> > where I have added the following drafts (needing review volunteers):
> >
> > draft-ietf-alto-deployments-
> > draft-ietf-cdni-footprint-capabilities-semantics-
> > draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-
> > draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-
> > draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-
> >
> > If you don't see your name on the "Completed" sheet, let me suggest 
> > that it's time to participate (or retire from the pm-dir to pursue 
> > other activities that keep you busy).
> > This way, we can keep the reviews voluntary and avoid random or 
> > round-robin review assignments.
> >
> > For those attending IETF-87, we will likely have a short pm-dir 
> > organizational meeting. Let me know (off-list) if you will be in 
> > Berlin and are willing to attend if we can find an available time.
> > Directorate membership will be discussed.
> >
> > regards,
> > Al
> > pm-dir admin
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf
> >> Of Benoit Claise
> >> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:06 PM
> >> To: pm-dir@ietf.org
> >> Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> This is an automatically generated email.
> >> It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, 
> >> as
> a
> >> normative or informative reference.
> >> It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain 
> >> "performance metric".
> >>
> >> Regards, Benoit
> >>
> >> ===========================================================
> >>
> >> Normative References
> >> --------------------
> >> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-03               Active
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-06 In IESG 
> >> processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>
> >>
> >> Informative References
> >> ----------------------
> >> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-03               Active
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-14   In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-12        In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-15             In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-06 In IESG 
> >> processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-14                  In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-10                 Active
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-11        In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-06     Active
> >>
> >> drafts containing performance metric
> >> ------------------------------------
> >> draft-ietf-alto-deployments-06                    Active
> >> draft-ietf-alto-protocol-16                       Active
> >> draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-04                  Active
> >> draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-00                    Active
> >> draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-00                      Active
> >> draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-00            Active
> >> draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-03                   Active
> >> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-03               Active
> >> draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-07                       In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>
> >> draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-03                      Active
> >> draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-09                 In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <AD Evaluation>
> >> draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol-01          Active
> >> draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-06                  Active
> >> draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-06                    Active
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-14   In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-12        In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-15             In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-06 In IESG 
> >> processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-14                  In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-08        Active
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-10                 Active
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-11        In IESG processing -
> ID
> >> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> >> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-06     Active
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pm-dir mailing list
> >> pm-dir@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
> > _______________________________________________
> > pm-dir mailing list
> > pm-dir@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
>

_______________________________________________
pm-dir mailing list
pm-dir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir