Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

"MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Tue, 30 April 2013 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8350421F8484 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lq41n420RBt6 for <pm-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160AB21F9A4D for <pm-dir@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.10]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA77120316; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 08:09:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com [135.207.177.33]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00CFE15BF; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 08:09:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com ([fe80::3598:75fe:b400:9299]) by njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com ([fe80::3598:75fe:b400:9299%11]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 08:09:15 -0400
From: "MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 08:09:14 -0400
Thread-Topic: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
Thread-Index: Ac5FOWL7Vb/2/iLATPeUaJRW4kwxqgAX+MwA
Message-ID: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1BFF9F1B75@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
References: <20130428210605.GA5863@sweet-brew-5.cisco.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1BFF9F1AC4@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com> <CAKe6YvPFB6Z8ODXS35HQhdf5_n9z+wVpmQ2FmHQRDPq=_a9Tjg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKe6YvPFB6Z8ODXS35HQhdf5_n9z+wVpmQ2FmHQRDPq=_a9Tjg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1BFF9F1B75njfpsrvexg7re_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "pm-dir@ietf.org" <pm-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
X-BeenThere: pm-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics Directorate Discussion list <pm-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pm-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir>, <mailto:pm-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:09:21 -0000

Hi Vin,

You're right about -xr-loss-conceal-05, it didn't show-up in the
diff, so the new version must have been uploaded before April 12.
There were a few updates between March 15 and April 12 that the
diff didn't capture - we will sort those out over time.

However, I'm not sure it's worth tracking the version number in general.
I think we want to indicate which version was reviewed in the status
column, and that's probably all we need...

I've added you as reviewer for xr-loss-conceal, and xr-synchronization.
draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem- does not define metrics, it's just a problem statement,
but feel free to provide comments on the IPPM list.

There are lots of knowledgeable performance people reading drafts in BMWG and IPPM,
so while we have plenty of drafts in other working groups needing volunteers and
completed reviews, I have left those off the list.

Al
pm-dir admin



From: Vinayak Hegde [mailto:vinayakh@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 8:27 PM
To: MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: Benoit Claise; pm-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email

Hi Al,

I am looking at the sheet now and I am not able to see the changes. For example, I cannot see ippm-rate-problem-03 in the list. Also I see that RTCP-xr-loss-conceal is on -05 but the sheet says -04. Probably not updated. Can you please check if the updation has synced with google. Google can sometimes be lazy with syncing docs.

That said I can volunteer to pick up 3 drafts for review as long as the review deadline is atleast 3 weeks away:
1. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05
2. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-02
3. draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-03

I checked the expiry dates on all three and they are atleast a few months away. But I am not sure if any of the authors has requested an early review. Picking up the rtcp stuff since I have already done 1 review and am familiar with the subject matter.

Regards
Vinayak
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:37 AM, MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL) <acmorton@att.com<mailto:acmorton@att.com>> wrote:
pm-dir,

I just brought our shared spread sheet up to date:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmKrqWIOBsprdGZqMnB6dmx5bFJvVUhta3VLSjl3SkE#gid=0

The diff below is the sort of thing I hope we will soon see appended to
our weekly e-mails from Benoit. Until that's possible, I will try to
run the diffs myself (when I have access to the machine running the
scripts, unfortunately it's a lab machine so not easily accessible)
and subsequently update the spread sheet.

Obviously, we have many documents without reviewers assigned!
Please look at the list and volunteer. There's a particular need to
review the drafts on lines 2 and 4.

regards,
Al
pm-dir admin

Diffs from "Last Week" (actually 04-12) -=old, +=new
--------------------
--- pmol-old-content.txt        2013-04-12...
+++ pmol-uniq-content.txt       2013-04-29 14:24:21.021862213 -0400
@@ -4 +4 @@
-draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-02                   Active
+draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-03                   Active
@@ -6,2 +6,2 @@
-draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-mib-06                    In IESG processing - ID
Tracker state <In Last Call>
-draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-07                       In IESG processing - ID
Tracker state <AD Evaluation>
+draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-mib-06                    In IESG processing - ID
Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>
+draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-07                       In IESG processing - ID
Tracker state <AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed>
@@ -13,4 +13,2 @@
-draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02                  Active
-draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-12   In IESG processing - ID
Tracker state <IESG Evaluation>
-draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-11      In IESG processing - ID
Tracker state <Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup
needed>
-draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-concsec-03             Active
+draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-14   In IESG processing - ID
Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::AD Followup>
+draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-12      In IESG processing - ID
Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
@@ -18 +16 @@
-draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-12             Active
+draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-13             In IESG processing - ID
Tracker state <Publication Requested>
@@ -20 +18 @@
-draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-10                  Active
+draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-11                  Active


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:pm-dir-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf
> Of Benoit Claise
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 5:06 PM
> To: pm-dir@ietf.org<mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
> Subject: [pm-dir] Performance metrics doctors generated email
>
> Dear all,
>
> This is an automatically generated email.
> It lists the IETF internet-drafts that reference the PMOL RFC 6390, as a
> normative or informative reference.
> It also lists all the IETF internet-drafts that contain "performance
> metric".
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
> ===========================================================
>
> Normative References
> --------------------
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-05 Active
>
> Informative References
> ----------------------
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-14   In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::AD Followup>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-12      In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-11        In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::External Party>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-13             In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <Publication Requested>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-05 Active
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-11                  Active
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05        Active
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-06                 Active
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-11        In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-04     Active
>
> drafts containing performance metric
> ------------------------------------
> draft-ietf-alto-deployments-06                    Active
> draft-ietf-alto-protocol-14                       Active
> draft-ietf-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-04                  Active
> draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-03                   Active
> draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02               Active
> draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-mib-06                    In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead>
> draft-ietf-manet-smf-mib-07                       In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <AD Evaluation>
> draft-ietf-nvo3-framework-02                      Active
> draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-08                 In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed>
> draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-00              Active
> draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-06                  In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <AD Evaluation>
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-06                    Active
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-14   In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <IESG Evaluation::AD Followup>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-12      In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-11        In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::External Party>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-13             In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <Publication Requested>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-rle-metrics-05 Active
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-11                  Active
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05        Active
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-06                 Active
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-11        In IESG processing - ID
> Tracker state <RFC Ed Queue>
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-04     Active
> _______________________________________________
> pm-dir mailing list
> pm-dir@ietf.org<mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir
_______________________________________________
pm-dir mailing list
pm-dir@ietf.org<mailto:pm-dir@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pm-dir