Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material")
John Curran <jcurran@nic.near.net> Sat, 05 December 1992 02:06 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15620; 4 Dec 92 21:06 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15611; 4 Dec 92 21:06 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24949; 4 Dec 92 21:07 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15606; 4 Dec 92 21:06 EST
Received: from nic.near.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24944; 4 Dec 92 21:07 EST
To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
cc: "James R. (Chuck) Davin" <davin@bellcore.com>
Subject: Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material")
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 04 Dec 92 18:37:28 -0500. <9212042337.AA09237@phila.bellcore.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1992 21:07:34 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: John Curran <jcurran@nic.near.net>
Message-ID: <9212042107.aa24944@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
-------- From: "James R. (Chuck) Davin" <davin@bellcore.com> Subject: Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Date: Fri, 04 Dec 92 18:37:28 -0500 The notion of "Design Teams" should not be formalized. When people get together in a small, informal, closed group to exchange ideas on technology, they are having fun and doing the community a service. When people get together in a small, formally recognized, closed group for the purpose of producing an agreed specification destined for promulgation as a standard, they may be in violation of Federal law. ... If we do not recognize a formal relationship between WG's and design teams, then we should at least provide some guidelines for how "significant contributions developed outside of the WG process" should be handled when brought into a WG for consideration. We don't have to tackle this issue immediately, but it's probably a good idea to put it on the agenda for "poised II". /John
- v 1.2, IETF material Carl Malamud
- Change suggestion Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material John C Klensin
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Erik Huizer
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Dave Crocker
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Bob Stewart
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material John C Klensin
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Barry M. Leiner
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Frank Kastenholz
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material John C Klensin
- Re: Design Teams (was v 1.2, IETF material) Bob Stewart
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Dave Crocker
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Dave Crocker
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Marshall Rose
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Bob Stewart
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") John C Klensin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Marshall Rose
- Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Marshall Rose
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Barry M. Leiner
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Dave Crocker
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Frank Kastenholz
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") James R. (Chuck) Davin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") John Curran
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Carl Malamud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- v 1.2, IETF material Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Bob Stewart
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Einar Stefferud
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Dave Crocker