IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs

Ken Fischer <ietf@kenfischer.net> Fri, 17 August 2012 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kenfischer.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED6011E809B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ApBWdqG3-gFn for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B849311E80D1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D83F594069; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.108] (c-67-172-143-206.hsd1.co.comcast.net [67.172.143.206]) (Authenticated sender: ietf@kenfischer.net) by homiemail-a33.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BA85759405E; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:46:56 -0600
From: Ken Fischer <ietf@kenfischer.net>
Sender: Ken Fischer <ken.fischer@bt.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CC53DF14.24B3B%ken.fischer@bt.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs
In-Reply-To: <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4840E4DEF42@tk5ex14mbxc272.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:47:00 -0000

 +1 on Matthew's recommendation.  I agree that .722 should be on the
SHOULD list, but honestly I think most people who implement beyond the
MUST will add what ever they like, and what ever they have access to, and
so the ultimate impact of the SHOULDs has always been questionable to me.

Ken

On 8/17/12 10:30 AM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> wrote:

>I agree. OPUS because it will be the IETF standard for wideband audio on
>the Internet, G.711 for maximum interoperability. G.722 is a reasonable
>thing to put on the "SHOULD" list... there's some other good choices for
>the SHOULD list, but they unfortunately come with additional IPR issues.
>
>Matthew Kaufman
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>Of Bernard Aboba
>Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:42 PM
>To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>Cc: Cullen Jennings (fluffy); rtcweb@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs
>
>I also support the selection of OPUS and G.711 as MTI. G.722 can be a
>SHOULD; it is widely supported.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>rtcweb@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status