IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue

Victor Pascual Avila <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com> Mon, 28 October 2013 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFF211E8210 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2NYWTcGtusfM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E400511E81DB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r10so6659061pdi.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rAQzIZb2nq0xC7jDb1NlgXB1UyYzQil3iFnnx/6c11Q=; b=tAvMbzV97DK5ho8VgD6R6RE4L24XtDaSFazMWKruswtMSXBJQ/8in23wYJvexBZ0vp Kd3+hDIpE96ieHoHSvmV2oZ/yMfZjMjeqdgHIKR0+OHZc+Z42CUePXvQTsmSQwOrX8NP DBKNTWWN8qvCRjOw+HQlvf5QQUlei9P0wXzPeT33IkkEBkFr+2VcLOq8sFlnng6MZW9a N9Lni/tgK5I3QHO8sflR8HxcXjCYZ/bEs/y1N7OYIZ3Xfkc8vO4jtc/Cbmn+7q8hfzDK Zt2BxzUjOuGcWEXN3jlo+/ikGAicDZwF8c3pQ52ATtNfh2W//p/X5qT9jD6rsZApmu1c nW7Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.65.195 with SMTP id z3mr23876164pas.47.1382945889052; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.192.66 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <526DD834.8000308@bbs.darktech.org>
References: <52681A96.2020904@alvestrand.no> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4843D45DC08@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <5269764C.4030801@librevideo.org> <52698758.5040404@bbs.darktech.org> <CAD6AjGSb5syh0HO+89fH8cGZ0zqM6gYLPj3aeTRQLN0u8W4cSg@mail.gmail.com> <5269F098.2020904@alvestrand.no> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A0F272E@008-AM1MPN1-043.mgdnok.nokia.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0BF358@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAGgHUiRtXUAJTotAFX7YwQ6cS_OD-MpAb+898c6OYxm7D5xXKw@mail.gmail.com> <FCBEDCB500188C488DA30C874B94F80E1C01158C@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-1iV4_SvToRYYtDZszxkSDF0qmrS4YN8w7OFQ3p29CaDw@mail.gmail.com> <526AE703.8000409@bbs.darktech.org> <CA+9kkMC=RrmAEyd0uWjpPhvCGuUnj5ATmuZrA7FnAxXhqMJXrg@mail.gmail.com> <526C15CD.5020601@bbs.darktech.org> <526C3FE4.2040301@alvestrand.no> <526C4686.2080702@bbs.darktech.org> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB123CE3208@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <526DD834.8000308@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:38:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGTXFp-Vj1w0Zo5V1+F3eE7WdPAjueP+=Gcc6gPMcWxhvgtoVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Victor Pascual Avila <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:38:24 -0000

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:21 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
> On 27/10/2013 2:26 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
>>
>> Apple people have been involved (in fact are co-authors of some of the
>> drafts on the VP8 vs H264 topic) and Microsoft clearly been very involved
>> with the WG as well. Kaufman has been clear his employer has a policy of not
>> pre announcing products and I believe the same is true of Apple. This is
>> often true of standards work in any WG so it limits how much people can
>> exactly say about their employers until product is announced - that's pretty
>> normal at IETF.
>
>
>     Out of curiosity, who is representing Apple? I don't remember seeing the
> company name appearing on any of the documentation.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal-03

-Victor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email