IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 13 December 2013 05:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BEC1AE672 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:54:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vryzptIvI60b for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:54:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399E41AE671 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:54:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBD5r78B018157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:53:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1386913994; bh=1S6dlMoGaDS7VT1iiD9I+1M5WUENJtoswtQYgcHbYeA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=ChQNYE33uYy7TisNCZ/sA1gPYw9H22bPKL5bK6ibFK1GHWdykO+BMgusSLi5ZufkG BuZ+5xXjyfzmG7RuXfSOt2csYKjLvCJKEUZeHdA16mEHb8CrHFOjpFro5J42sHMek7 t7UL70OkcAExs+R3NB8JuSYd93QG9gjL/XnnXzDg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1386913994; i=@resistor.net; bh=1S6dlMoGaDS7VT1iiD9I+1M5WUENJtoswtQYgcHbYeA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=hPNi0Q+Qvb4vr/Q+ljdkxD4h6sdexg06p7XJFvJf88MnncmtHrb96CSjpOsj+Q+bZ Ypg7pheJDlNeZyYrUZXmlXOegBxdYSrk69m51BxwsiXRfiknzC4M6uGxbeemohT/rz KaI175eT7tNDdqeaXv7ncLUQVQes4xTJUTWJ6vug=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131212214755.0c65acc0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:52:58 -0800
To: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CECFF758.205FF%mzanaty@cisco.com>
References: <20131212011550.GM3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <E8882BCE-4795-4CF5-B785-18C2141A5DE2@iii.ca> <CAD5OKxvy8xGuiR7oUbJJwTaxGfPJ=MHpd8Hp5MfpPLy8LmNaQg@mail.gmail.com> <D5A2C5EC-C65F-4E39-9A56-315B94C5FB1D@iii.ca> <CAD5OKxs-OoqwbQgBy7K4wQRffCk0=8Qmo_xJQdSwhBL2F85v1g@mail.gmail.com> <20131212214310.GR3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <CECFA3EA.AC30E%stewe@stewe.org> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F8739@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <20131213024334.GV3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0F88D6@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <20131213033344.GW3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <CECFF758.205FF%mzanaty@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 05:54:51 -0000

Hi Mo,
At 21:40 12-12-2013, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:
>The confusion here is that the VP8 bitstream is defined in IETF (RFC 
>6386). So there are

That RFC is not an IETF document [1].

Regards,
-sm

1. http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6386

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email