Re: [stir] current draft charter

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 6/12/2013 3:01 PM, Peterson, Jon wrote:
> But we don't even have to be asking ourselves about the relevance of
> public ENUM to the proposed work here in STIR unless we want to try to
> base everything on keying in the public DNS for telephone numbers. There
> are other models for this that don't have the liabilities I described
> above, anyway. Keying in private DNS is more viable, for example. I think
> a PKI is more viable.


Other models?

Is there a written description of the integrated query service that you 
folks are considering, in terms of design, administration and operation?

It would help to also hear where such a design has already been 
successfully deployed.

As the Enum experience showed, schemes can be intelligent and appealing 
but not succeed.  So for any new deployment, any analysis needs to start 
with skepticism and work its way up with pragmatics.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net