Re: [stir] current draft charter

Dan York <york@isoc.org> Wed, 12 June 2013 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <york@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47E121E804D for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dW-sJzrDRbAg for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0210.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61FF11E80E7 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR06MB067.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.187.146) by BLUPR06MB065.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.187.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.702.21; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:40:12 +0000
Received: from BLUPR06MB067.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.16.130]) by BLUPR06MB067.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.16.15]) with mapi id 15.00.0702.005; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:40:12 +0000
From: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Thread-Topic: [stir] current draft charter
Thread-Index: AQHOZwiVGT8OWD09JUqSfli80C7Gm5kxT0wAgAAL0QCAAIQHAIAAcu6AgAADDoCAABB/AP//41KA
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:40:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CDDE44D8.D939%york@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CDDE043A.1F643%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.101.5]
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB065; H:BLUPR06MB067.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <646EE9253D64D242ABA7F881CC130E2F@namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
Cc: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [stir] current draft charter
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stir>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:40:23 -0000

On 6/12/13 2:22 PM, "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> wrote:


>Agreed. Though I do think that even for the domain model, we could get
>some value from looking at DANE to improve the way that credentials are
>managed. Whether we put the keys in the DNS or just point to the approved
>cert by reference, we should probably have some means for the successor to
>RFC4474 Identity-Info to tip off relying parties to DANE.

Agreed (as you would expect me to say). I've been thinking about how DANE
could help here, but...

>But yes, for the telephone model it seems unlikely that casting these as
>domain names will get us very far.

... I think this issue will get in the way right now.  As much as I would
love to see this as a good example of where DANE can help, I still haven't
been able to wrap my brain around how we could use DNS for telephone
numbers without running into all the exact same issues that made public
ENUM non-deployable.  :-(

I agree, though, that it would be helpful to have some way for a header to
alert relying parties to DANE in the event that there is a way it can work.

Dan