Re: [stir] current draft charter - ENUM and databases

Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Tue, 18 June 2013 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7D021F8E98 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.112, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1OgYehDUilGM for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rambutan.cc.columbia.edu (rambutan.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5328A21F9B8E for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-98-204-176-168.hsd1.va.comcast.net [98.204.176.168]) (user=hgs10 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by rambutan.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r5I21IWE016485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:01:19 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4AFB94AF-03E0-4AF9-B04D-C45C99C06BBD@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:01:18 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <13DABAE1-72D4-44C5-8211-A4A7F79DDCE4@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <CDE40112.214EA%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <7E81F8CD-8C7C-45B0-812A-FF8B056680A3@oracle.com> <018b01ce6b84$c2d72da0$488588e0$@shockey.us> <4AFB94AF-03E0-4AF9-B04D-C45C99C06BBD@oracle.com>
To: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.5
Cc: stir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [stir] current draft charter - ENUM and databases
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stir>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:01:25 -0000

For the boring details, see

http://www.nanc-chair.org/

See http://www.nanc-chair.org/docs/documents.html ("Contribution factor") for the latest.

On Jun 17, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:

> 
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 2:01 PM, "Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> [Note: this doesn't mean NPAC can't be used for this database in the NANP,
>> even though NPAC is a closed model and charged for query access I think.]
>> [RS> ] 
>> 
>> [RS> ] Not since 2009. The NPAC like most national numbering databases are
>> now operated on fixed price contracts.  The days of transaction based or dip
>> charges are long long gone.  Cost recovery is usually based on the number of
>> entries or TN's in the data base and an annual allocation model approved by
>> the national regulator. 
> 
> Excellent.  Then there's no problem on that front, either. :)
> 
> -hadriel
> 
>