Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 29 July 2020 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836393A0BE3 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id flNtrNhxuwCK for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E29913A0BC4 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7469B548068; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:36:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 6E6B7440043; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:36:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:36:31 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>, "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20200729153631.GF1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <CA+wi2hMsSVn44PEoPeKHyyvnZ2eaE8bmyM0vGQMNYB3rc8DoWQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F7672D9-91FE-4D0E-ADA0-69EB0C2438A9@ietf.org> <CABFReBq04ERNkhp412QAJM-tqLA0cUnjbj6FXqeXQTGaWC-yAA@mail.gmail.com> <AEA414AB-D633-4258-8BDE-7FB2F7B72651@ietf.org> <CA+wi2hOa4W+R+_DD3T7Cn90g5CL4YZ7HyTv8omVudvAzP2fZYA@mail.gmail.com> <CABFReBrjbZPeqDrKZAfNw45t5qawRrCL53Xx60psongXgHQ_2A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hPn200ZeToVU2CAYK=4LZkjTBRJpm9Zu1_q0xqVnOhJ7g@mail.gmail.com> <20200729144816.GB1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <BE4F6E5F-291B-43AC-83A8-DC10F7F0E466@cable.comcast.com> <EE9662D9-323D-4809-8EB0-D6978636A6FC@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EE9662D9-323D-4809-8EB0-D6978636A6FC@fugue.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/9Zh6nRf6FpLh2OsJHDJpGjZHYp0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Meetecho rooms being opened to chairs 10 minutes before sessions would be _really_ helpful
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:36:45 -0000

Ted,

I need to check more how much of the usual in-between session break time we have in the
agenda. If it's similar, then we could emulate common physcial meeting experience to
allow past-meeting time for that period.

As said in other mail, we should ahve meetecho for ad-hoc WG side meetings later in the
week for specific topics. These where greeat in physcial meetings, albeit they where
not "official". But we have no way for non-chairs to set up a quick side meeting
without getting on top of all-private tooling. Hence WG-chairs could at least
help to set these up and allow them to use official WG tooling. Remember last such
side meeting being ANIMA/ACME and LAMPs derived...

Cheers
    Toerless

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:27:52AM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2020, at 11:24 AM, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
> > - Allow users to enter a meeting session 60 mins beforehand and for the session to run for 120 mins afterwards before the session terminates. (Seems logical that they must terminate to free up server resources - but enable some normal meeting time run over as well as post-meeting banter/wrap up.)
> 
> Please no. This would be a real abuse of the IETF process. A 120 minute meeting afterwards would be a side meeting, not the WG meeting. It should be handled explicitly as a side meeting.
> 
> If we want WGs to have more time, this isn???t the way to do it.
> 

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de