IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 20 April 2011 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D5BE0750 for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.774
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.774 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OfMEz-9C5dL2 for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::2]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C35E0742 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1DEF81B3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:08:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B958FF81C5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:08:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 54456 invoked by uid 1007); 20 Apr 2011 14:08:23 +0200
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:08:23 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Message-ID: <20110420120823.GX30227@Space.Net>
References: <54E900DC635DAB4DB7A6D799B3C4CD8E10C7309D@PLSWM12A.ad.sprint.com> <C9D3DB43.3981D%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C9D3DB43.3981D%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "ron@bonica.org" <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:08:26 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:40:23AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Ok, so let's go for the draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory, as we seem to have
> agreement on that, but not on 6to4-to-historic.

We have rough consensus for 6to4-to-historic.

> In my context and the context of my customers, where 6to4 works much
> better than what is being reported, having some IPv6 support is much
> better than not having it.

Feel free to leave it enabled on your machines, nobody is yanking out
the code from your implementations.

But *listen* to folks like Tore who have had serious problems enabling 
content on IPv6 (and I assume this is what you also want to see!) 
*because* of 6to4.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status