Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Sat, 23 April 2011 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F027DE0663 for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sm5BYeD7kOoE for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D32E0613 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LK400MI7NC0DAV0@mail-out.apple.com> for v6ops@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7c70ae00000719a-c4-4db357273e2f
Received: from jimbu (jimbu.apple.com [17.151.62.37]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (RC4-MD5/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id C6.59.29082.72753BD4; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.2] (adit.conjury.org [75.101.54.88]) by cardamom.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LK4007BKNC6WT70@cardamom.apple.com> for v6ops@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <20110423.180828.74727913.sthaug@nethelp.no>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:48:07 -0700
Message-id: <04463D0E-CE36-4A40-8273-72EB61D3DE6C@apple.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1104211405450.14690@netcore.fi> <AEAA108B-BDD3-4810-8464-A483D572EADF@cisco.com> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1104212051370.22232@netcore.fi> <20110423.180828.74727913.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1216)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 22:48:09 -0000

On Apr 23, 2011, at 9:08 AM, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:

> In any case, I think it's quite clear that we need to get a document
> out which says in no uncertain terms that 6to4 should not be enabled
> by default.

I thought 6to4-advisory already said that.  If it doesn't perhaps Brain could be persuaded to amend it.  It's good advice for all the reasons described in that document.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, core os networking