IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382F21A0024 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:52:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H3YEP9WF_ZPB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:52:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6431A000F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:52:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id rl12so6283635iec.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:52:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=dkb3aoj+zHs8aumt9rrYlvKTvcvNxe+uB3aiUTvJaAA=; b=QMftyxJvv4AvF+2CFrgwA1izHrU4vwcereMJHYQ1PytBes2qPyuHnzMJQ5F8dSMb/e duk3DyY5Hlj7ENJPRmZwy80t0yPGKj0pfhsCm9Hcl62t/vnzp5pGW9/P05OvP2FonKek cd7jaEZ9PLltOtIBzjctkj9lmKstN2Ntk10p6f6c1HziD+Ead/ij9ORADrskIhxhIMZd oumh/eODcqtQhAUrykp9bCz6W3k297D53P/ltKX/vARu7pVvlo5xE6LSJS/sC6HUviLB oXBdMiRQZnoh4qZzpFQI79qsrm/cSdSYh7bh9dbnmvXmHFW1sy+45sJPn/toxh9SE1kV 53hA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dkb3aoj+zHs8aumt9rrYlvKTvcvNxe+uB3aiUTvJaAA=; b=Yx+KkcLOZE/jgZJxr+OI8uVsDJ8tdgru9n22vCc0Fn5DGSfuq5XvuDAVsWrSIKGmek /jyy3AXl8IZRwUDWXpd5s6csQ39aiP2TSWb9yURU2CNfqpromBiPvzX7RUGQi5wBX9n4 nnZb7ziPwNFpJuTgQNTCHc1dGMKH+NkColVE7J3pYzluYuTNNBFZkpwvWcFd16Sx9DPA bAzoKplqFDGQxUrYs8RJJTIhN0TrWBXhO/InihGqV/t1gSTr9qp+4OnuVYmZq4xZXNGr hl5JKLFTBFUs9yX7p1enToy1muEg00l2SoDPzK0yVEgc4Y2++YAymukHKXEEQEfTGyYs KG3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnEgOYUo3GuE349Q8Im5l8u/ISUYdAgFUvAFiPD3OFQ1Njju0YAsVsIIQxlPBclJcRnTqF1
X-Received: by 10.50.142.106 with SMTP id rv10mr5496888igb.18.1423093963182; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:52:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:52:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54D2AE1A.4070603@gmail.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr28Mto=bvq2eRoKbwKZfkQovH9vr1oumwQhP7ZGp9iS0w@mail.gmail.com> <1328555025.2415573.1423092240089.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <54D2AE1A.4070603@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 08:52:22 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0yuHr3QKnLFPz_H1_5mUtmoPARw=aT7-1n6SVx=yxAFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3d13a2873ad050e4be27e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BP7zgWTua0Cb4DXqFEBvAjCY9Wg>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 23:52:45 -0000

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 05/02/2015 12:23, Mark ZZZ Smith wrote:
> > While I appreciate that the draft isn't advising to block 6to4, I think
> it would be useful to gain some more detailed insight into the consequences
> of blocking 6to4 (i.e., which OSes/browsers might be impacted). Depending
> on the results, it may also mean that making a strong statement not to
> block 6to4 traffic in the draft would be beneficial, reinforcing what is in
> RFC6343.
>
> otoh, if we leave the text as it is now we have a fair chance of getting
> through
> the IETF Last Call and the IESG, and finally getting this done.
>

+1. We can always explore that question in a separate document once this
one is published. If it turns out that blocking provides no benefit and/or
is harmful, then nothing changes. If it turns out that it can be done
safely, then we can issue an operational guidance document advising it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email