IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 27 January 2015 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E681A037B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:43:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jGKqSn0vMZjy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:43:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CFF51A0062 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:43:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hn18so1869689igb.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:43:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=rw5Ey2PavVuC8YhsPobKf9kw2JSE6xu9in+nm3DiaPY=; b=TPcq2h5vvPb6zt93rTKYPkgv0xp4QGgi5Z+79ApMEsKxC7a+4Fh1z8TWDaDEV4pj0I nRXyLk7b7j12rNanNrE8DD2nR61CxT7YxRXLheCfmE5GO+fQNCpVp91DTyQib9K8/cri 3YkXk2FxmXMQgzVjj73w+pJ/8UH0mzWOsEKXu2AkzfnNMdjR3VbWRXqj7+HJxRlbQxBC ZxlQ1wcyyD6ySs46RjNFHQd8bRPZ6Tinre63bIf7sqQVHqbAKEaCPLnuaS1ZNrZBJypZ XrMlJgAPhB8IL3wdO5I0XGEI3fCso+bnGGQiJyjI8Gs5/WUNRyM4BZ8CEHJwKmoDB9Cx ebwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=rw5Ey2PavVuC8YhsPobKf9kw2JSE6xu9in+nm3DiaPY=; b=H7W8BgetERuLJ1mQiYiZr1E/3W7ZEJ4t4EluNGxDekc8SUPzJtpj4H/s2VwOqr4RHc 6aoIwLpsiqHS8u+i3/08b9G6MFsUjwMZJw3jORZwbC4PIDUfypQk2LFa0uc78Tm1Zr0G qeeghU5azfYfwa2nBysvhwZfq2S11B8EySpsBTMHuHDBWHXxLww3hqhZhT4Vsnq5gqBg vSu/AEzoIRLaWU1lKyvWOhTE4p05YM5ucuc6lcZ/0PU1KOSzOnjnvgOsYH2fAHqIY89m HxbVvzIEVDQYMzPk6xZ2U6t5n3+vV6+08NV1UBGQlEtwwbHOzalW1p2+CcLKuqNpY3d6 61eA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlF+bUCE+toiXWD1nzmf8HxmfvBIS7g6TMOXhhsOArVvthOmpUosTlJfD+2JynGbe0K9g3t
X-Received: by 10.50.222.70 with SMTP id qk6mr19233665igc.47.1422319414083; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:43:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.138.136 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:43:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54C6DD1D.2030000@gmail.com>
References: <54BEB741.8060709@gmail.com> <248188907.4210717.1421800222689.JavaMail.yahoo@jws106136.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <CAKD1Yr1Ec7=g5VNZtbBw6Tutr2oi-1_SmcEJu_JCDKUvSGsAUA@mail.gmail.com> <54C6DD1D.2030000@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:43:13 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3Vi0Ze9Ui_Nqs6V90wX4mW2oKQE4nTnk7aC2k=WaN-Dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11344d8a6f34e9050d978b75"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/x0ScMmfzvdAOqYGPe9VkajgrAiI>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:43:36 -0000

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sure. But if I was one of the ~100k users concerned, I wouldn't want to
> be told that I wasn't important. I think s/substantial/measurable/
> should fix this.
>

I see. Ok then Brian  you're a unique, precious snowflake, one in ten
thousand. :-P

But seriously - no opposition to s/substantial/measurable/ - because it is,
in fact, measurable.


> Well, reviewing the emails I've archived, I see mild support for
> formally obsoleting it and no strong opposition.
>

I suppose my question was really only procedural: *can* we even obsolete an
individual submission? It's not a document based on IETF consensus, so if
IETF consensus was not necessary to publish it, then how can IETF consensus
be sufficient to obsolete it?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email