IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com> Wed, 20 April 2011 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AD4E0704 for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VswXwhn9Uo0f for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.214]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1A1E0695 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.86.9) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:55:54 -0700
Received: from tk5-exmlt-s701.segroup.winse.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.90.63) by TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.86.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.8; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:55:55 -0700
Received: from NA-EXMSG-S702.segroup.winse.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.98.200]) by tk5-exmlt-s701.segroup.winse.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.90.63]) with mapi; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:55:16 -0700
From: Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:55:15 -0700
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
Thread-Index: Acv/gt53ccsR3BvlTz2tZHvmVJ1P2QAAJMIA
Message-ID: <DD1A73D9E9C89144A927C5080F70285A015E3F1E04CE@NA-EXMSG-S702.segroup.winse.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <4984B8F2-AC42-491E-9C2B-BE999B279759@cisco.com> <E9CB623F-42B6-4254-A6C9-DF68F8CBB315@apple.com> <4DAC432B.90403@inex.ie> <A49BAC98-9B9A-43EF-AFC3-70BAF989DEF1@apple.com> <4269EA985EACD24987D82DAE2FEC62E5037FCA1D@XMB-AMS-101.cisco.com> <4DAEA916.90908@inex.ie> <4C603E97-C164-4426-8584-2A429FA41D35@employees.org> <DD1A73D9E9C89144A927C5080F70285A015E3F1E04C9@NA-EXMSG-S702.segroup.winse.corp.microsoft.com> <20110420174620.GA30227@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <20110420174620.GA30227@Space.Net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:55:56 -0000

Hi Gert,

To answer your question - avoid breaking those end users for whom 6to4 currently works and is the only available option for IPv6 connectivity, since it was stated on these WGLC threads that while many ISPs have deployment efforts under way, not that many ISPs already have *today* IPv6 offering to the end users.


Thank you,
Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert@space.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:46 AM
To: Dmitry Anipko
Cc: Ole Troan; Nick Hilliard; v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:37:32AM -0700, Dmitry Anipko wrote:
> it is not clear to me what the move to historic for RFC 3056 is trying to achieve or why it is necessary.

What do you hope to achieve by *not* moving RFC 3056 to historic?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status