Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lorenzo,

On 27/01/2015 13:43, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:

...
>> Well, reviewing the emails I've archived, I see mild support for
>> formally obsoleting it and no strong opposition.
>>
> 
> I suppose my question was really only procedural: *can* we even obsolete an
> individual submission? It's not a document based on IETF consensus, so if
> IETF consensus was not necessary to publish it, then how can IETF consensus
> be sufficient to obsolete it?

I am now sitting next to the Independent Series Editor at the NZNOG
meeting in warm, sunny Rotorua and he sees no problem of principle
in doing this, but we should ensure that it's checked with the ISE
during the IESG process. He would probably check with the original
authors of RFC 6732 to be sure. Therefore this will need to be noted
in the document writeup when the draft is passed on from the WG.

    Brian