IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Sun, 17 April 2011 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1088eeeaf3=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7439CE06A0 for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b+XgRlH4Ir6C for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [213.172.48.142]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BABFE0689 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1303065651; x=1303670451; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID: Thread-Topic:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=YqRtY2IdOJX0pFU/tq0zINfxi BRjbRxucbKO9fmn0ow=; b=s3wvUhjDAS2BI0xS2I0FsFsWdsHErli9pqCZkV+lI 5+bqubMBxR/xvRz0G5X0tXTBf5pXeQp7UvIZ1M4La12uanx4IBhynO9EQsePLG2D n/z3XVXK1+TdpSrQWtKohJW64TKTTAAqs4A4SLXx1DZVAZA33LxqPr76OQGAih6j bA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=dDjMURqzqhlAtp1BZUi8ttinmlEDoxIa/ARchD0yRr6cvu66M9fLhNhs6kYp /W+/GfVF9cD02o4s+CTsdm9pvnbFH5ntg3rhP3fvTC+THVTAuwXx5ALY6 WVZiHDJ+QWszDQbSyn5u7mgVe2RIoYefGvU/SUNXgLAxr15m6Exbbw=;
X-MDAV-Processed: consulintel.es, Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:40:51 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.118] by consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50003875006.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:40:51 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: consulintel.es, Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:40:51 +0200 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source)
X-MDPtrLookup-Result: pass dns.ptr=160.red-217-126-187.staticip.rima-tde.net (ip=217.126.187.160) (consulintel.es)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:110417:md50003875006::w1jOQTFZr+7wGoEA:00003E2l
X-MDRemoteIP: 217.126.187.160
X-Return-Path: prvs=1088eeeaf3=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:47:33 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <C9D101B9.39105%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104172040280.14027@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:47:44 -0000

I oppose to a deprecation of 6to4.

It is already the last resort, and I will be happy if the anycast is by
default configured off. This way, 6to4 is still useful peer-to-peer.

Otherwise, we need to follow the same approach for 6over4, ISATAP, Teredo
(I mean deprecating them), and for many many many other transition mechs.

Regards,
Jordi






-----Mensaje original-----
De: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Organización: People's Front Against WWW
Responder a: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Fecha: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:41:29 +0200 (CEST)
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
CC: <v6ops@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Asunto: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

>On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>
>> I could agree on deprecating RFC3068 and let the people use 6to4 end to
>> end, or with manually configured relays, but not definitively RFC3056.
>
>Do you oppose the new advise to recommend against having 6to4 default on?
>
>I think that's the major point I'm after anyway. It should be a concious
>decision to run 6to4, not something that is enabled by default.
>
>-- 
>Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status