Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Sat, 23 April 2011 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31E3E0680 for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.075
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.075 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.524, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TtIc8v3Ojauy for <v6ops@ietfc.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FC9E067C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8270 invoked by uid 399); 23 Apr 2011 18:03:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 65-241-43-5.globalsuite.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@65.241.43.5) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 23 Apr 2011 18:03:18 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 65.241.43.5
X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us
Message-ID: <4DB31464.7010602@dougbarton.us>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:03:16 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110319 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
References: <4984B8F2-AC42-491E-9C2B-BE999B279759@cisco.com> <E9CB623F-42B6-4254-A6C9-DF68F8CBB315@apple.com> <4DAC432B.90403@inex.ie> <A49BAC98-9B9A-43EF-AFC3-70BAF989DEF1@apple.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104182001560.14027@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4DB3086E.5070205@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DB3086E.5070205@bogus.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:03:25 -0000

On 04/23/2011 10:12, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> As with ripv1 to keep using that example however some set of devices
> currently using it will continue to do so until they can't anymore...
> That number may be vanishingly small ultimately (there are still devices
> doing ripv1).

Isn't 6bone a better example?

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/