IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3A41A1B15 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:18:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5vD-hcGFCjUg for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39C21A1B12 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:18:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hn18so382890igb.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:18:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=KikyuAEna+0zi3zpVfZa5DKnm6hi0BYoH0Rwzz2gZrg=; b=j2UV48IJ9IktGsXACrC+tv97y5KlbkDd6dbGvBKuAGv2nHsCJc1+V57Vyn5PZAJXPP Y8e1CwrJhPr1eq5/FRf7h8YrLYM4TeNn3CfMoIqB/5FrbsAe20XE7IKBPiXVWjU6oBrP omOi2lONE5SyLGG8etZWh8n64uqfesM6+18/OtGD0wps8H45wOh0JDhctZ9Z9dQJjLCG arhaonUabSZAE/DCkcdSsewi870zk5poL47G7NtdkrGVLvJ+9uIBxXxIhYHHQOelo8si XAg2n97VbmOu0B3dBL7/IKGTrQiUZ9wQSOKv+cXh+W3dxDOXG99+7mX7sc4Knt1s+22R VdmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KikyuAEna+0zi3zpVfZa5DKnm6hi0BYoH0Rwzz2gZrg=; b=ZIsghiWn/ZAkwuSyi6R9OTCA/2Gb7i9flcRZ5LHj7HOrCD0IAuXp99H/ZR9v3MySNV KHRiiPERX+q8QCHbZdz3eNG03/f1vrjYPsavBYDFcyL6gUAhU0IIKOBTpBqrQsbKom4B 3aGUMG2hunzQKpccQm2mvQ3OXGfdEsVYM3MxJvYAkYAbge8EphmZ7RVA1XtnzC7DPAEz NapebrSasokD9hmWtVyicmJfSOXrTo/ZepJU9fl0hNnuWTVeQL02m5s/ny/iG7PeaA2G H2b04uU63PLa13uZyFiF2g7oC8W8DFwd/K8gebSqGBrC/Zn3snazjEvs2YTVLdhl/Ypi ul2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsCvPKJqdgsqxZcyUstXviHEK3wpVJL05duHbtFmOohoqrCgcZEjtvWbSCXDWEsJkGqO9C
X-Received: by 10.50.66.131 with SMTP id f3mr21382134igt.7.1423009115932; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:18:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:18:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1954701383.1811136.1423005333378.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <CAKr6gn0n1bidX7rR6v6xAyCpxKE2KxOufkEYT1mfKsqj7AcM-A@mail.gmail.com> <1954701383.1811136.1423005333378.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:18:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr28Mto=bvq2eRoKbwKZfkQovH9vr1oumwQhP7ZGp9iS0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bdc07a2de2d9a050e38201d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/GL6I6k1jWGuvNF07rxvHZTtm69A>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:18:38 -0000

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:

> Would it be possible to conduct the same test with a dual stack site?
>

What would we learn from such an exercise? The OS / user-agent breakdown of
the 0.01% of hosts that use 6to4 when talking to dual-stack destinations?
Even if we knew that, what would we do with it?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email